Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33295835›Full record

ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2020

"Better dead than being mocked": an anthropological study on perceptions and attitudes towards unwanted pregnancy and abortion in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Doris Burtscher, Catrin Schulte-Hillen, Jean-François Saint-Sauveur, Eva De Plecker, Mohit Nair, Jovana Arsenijević

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Abortion Incidence among Young Women in Urban Slums and Non-Slums in Kinshasa, DR Congo.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Doris BurtscherResearch Associate, Principal investigator, Médecins Sans Frontières, Vienna Evaluation Unit/Anthropology, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3035-5884
Catrin Schulte-HillenSRH Specialist, Médecins Sans Frontières, International Office, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2192-2528
Jean-François Saint-SauveurMedical Director, Medical Department, Médecins Sans Frontières, Barcelona, Spain.
Eva De PleckerSRG and SV Working Group Leader, Medical Department, Médecins Sans Frontières, Brussels, Belgium.
Mohit NairResearch Assistant, Vienna Evaluation Unit, Médecins Sans Frontières, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3410-8541
Jovana ArsenijevićResearch Assistant, Operational Research Unit, Médecins Sans Frontières, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unwanted pregnancy and unsafe abortion contribute significantly to the burden of maternal suffering, ill health and death in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). This qualitative study examines the vulnerabilities of women and girls regarding unwanted pregnancy and abortion, to better understand their health-seeking behaviour and to identify barriers that hinder them from accessing care. Data were collected in three different areas in eastern DRC, using in-depth individual interviews, group interviews and focus group discussions. Respondents were purposively sampled. All interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcriptions were screened for relevant information, manually coded and analysed using qualitative content analysis. Perceptions and attitudes towards unwanted pregnancy and abortion varied across the three study areas. In North Kivu, interviews predominantly reflected the view that abortions are morally reprehensible, which contrasts the widespread practice of abortion. In Ituri many perceive abortions as an appropriate solution for reducing maternal mortality. Legal constraints were cited as a barrier for health professionals to providing adequate medical care. In South Kivu, the general view was one of opposition to abortion, with some tolerance towards breastfeeding women. The main reasons women have abortions are related to stigma and shame, socio-demographics and finances, transactional sex and rape. Contrary to the prevailing critical narrative on abortion, this study highlights a significant need for safe abortion care services. The proverb "Better dead than being mocked" shows that women and girls prefer to risk dying through unsafe abortion, rather than staying pregnant and facing stigma for an unwanted pregnancy.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedPregnancy, UnwantedAdultDemocratic Republic of the CongoFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPregnancyQualitative ResearchYoung Adultaccess to safe abortionDemocratic Republic of Congohealthcare provider’s attitudeinduced abortionMédecins Sans Frontièresmedical abortionstigmatermination of pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID33295835
PMCPMC7887976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.