Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33295759›Full record

ArticleChemical research in toxicology2021

Skin Doctor CP: Conformal Prediction of the Skin Sensitization Potential of Small Organic Molecules.

Anke Wilm, Ulf Norinder, M Isabel Agea, Christina de Bruyn Kops, Conrad Stork, Jochen Kühnl, Johannes Kirchmair

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical research in toxicology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anke WilmCenter for Bioinformatics (ZBH), Department of Informatics, Universität Hamburg, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2891-1407
Ulf NorinderDepartment of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, SE-16407 Kista, Sweden.
M Isabel AgeaDepartment of Informatics and Chemistry, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, 16628 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-3017-7742
Christina de Bruyn KopsCenter for Bioinformatics (ZBH), Department of Informatics, Universität Hamburg, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8890-2137
Conrad StorkCenter for Bioinformatics (ZBH), Department of Informatics, Universität Hamburg, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5499-742X
Jochen KühnlFront End Innovation, Beiersdorf AG, 22529 Hamburg, Germany.
Johannes KirchmairCenter for Bioinformatics (ZBH), Department of Informatics, Universität Hamburg, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2667-5877

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin sensitization potential or potency is an important end point in the safety assessment of new chemicals and new chemical mixtures. Formerly, animal experiments such as the local lymph node assay (LLNA) were the main form of assessment. Today, however, the focus lies on the development of nonanimal testing approaches (i.e., in vitro and in chemico assays) and computational models. In this work, we investigate, based on publicly available LLNA data, the ability of aggregated, Mondrian conformal prediction classifiers to differentiate between non- sensitizing and sensitizing compounds as well as between two levels of skin sensitization potential (weak to moderate sensitizers, and strong to extreme sensitizers). The advantage of the conformal prediction framework over other modeling approaches is that it assigns compounds to activity classes only if a defined minimum level of confidence is reached for the individual predictions. This eliminates the need for applicability domain criteria that often are arbitrary in their nature and less flexible. Our new binary classifier, named Skin Doctor CP, differentiates nonsensitizers from sensitizers with a higher reliability-to-efficiency ratio than the corresponding nonconformal prediction workflow that we presented earlier. When tested on a set of 257 compounds at the significance levels of 0.10 and 0.30, the model reached an efficiency of 0.49 and 0.92, and an accuracy of 0.83 and 0.75, respectively. In addition, we developed a ternary classification workflow to differentiate nonsensitizers, weak to moderate sensitizers, and strong to extreme sensitizers. Although this model achieved satisfactory overall performance (accuracies of 0.90 and 0.73, and efficiencies of 0.42 and 0.90, at significance levels 0.10 and 0.30, respectively), it did not obtain satisfying class-wise results (at a significance level of 0.30, the validities obtained for nonsensitizers, weak to moderate sensitizers, and strong to extreme sensitizers were 0.70, 0.58, and 0.63, respectively). We argue that the model is, in consequence, unable to reliably identify strong to extreme sensitizers and suggest that other ternary models derived from the currently accessible LLNA data might suffer from the same problem. Skin Doctor CP is available via a public web service at https://nerdd.zbh.uni-hamburg.de/skinDoctorII/.

Indexed as

Skin TestsAnimalsDatabases, FactualLocal Lymph Node AssayMiceMolecular StructureOrganic ChemicalsSkinSmall Molecule LibrariesOrganic ChemicalsSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID33295759
PMCPMC7887802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.