Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33295294›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

Transformation of Pathology Reports Into the Common Data Model With Oncology Module: Use Case for Colon Cancer.

Borim Ryu, Eunsil Yoon, Seok Kim, Sejoon Lee, Hyunyoung Baek, Soyoung Yi, Hee Young Na, Ji-Won Kim, Rong-Min Baek, Hee Hwang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Making the case for an International Childhood Cancer Data Partnership.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Borim RyuOffice of eHealth Research and Business, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2000-4565
Eunsil YoonOffice of eHealth Research and Business, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4809-5435
Seok KimOffice of eHealth Research and Business, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4996-8613
Sejoon LeeDepartment of Pathology and Translational Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6108-6341
Hyunyoung BaekOffice of eHealth Research and Business, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0810-9396
Soyoung YiOffice of eHealth Research and Business, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0845-0981
Hee Young NaDepartment of Pathology and Translational Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2464-0665
Ji-Won KimDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6426-9074
Rong-Min BaekDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0705-658X
Hee HwangOffice of eHealth Research and Business, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7964-1630
Sooyoung YooOffice of eHealth Research and Business, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8620-4925
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommon data models (CDMs) help standardize electronic health record data and facilitate outcome analysis for observational and longitudinal research. An analysis of pathology reports is required to establish fundamental information infrastructure for data-driven colon cancer research. The Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) CDM is used in distributed research networks for clinical data; however, it requires conversion of free text-based pathology reports into the CDM's format. There are few use cases of representing cancer data in CDM.

objectiveIn this study, we aimed to construct a CDM database of colon cancer-related pathology with natural language processing (NLP) for a research platform that can utilize both clinical and omics data. The essential text entities from the pathology reports are extracted, standardized, and converted to the OMOP CDM format in order to utilize the pathology data in cancer research.

methodsWe extracted clinical text entities, mapped them to the standard concepts in the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics vocabularies, and built databases and defined relations for the CDM tables. Major clinical entities were extracted through NLP on pathology reports of surgical specimens, immunohistochemical studies, and molecular studies of colon cancer patients at a tertiary general hospital in South Korea. Items were extracted from each report using regular expressions in Python. Unstructured data, such as text that does not have a pattern, were handled with expert advice by adding regular expression rules. Our own dictionary was used for normalization and standardization to deal with biomarker and gene names and other ungrammatical expressions. The extracted clinical and genetic information was mapped to the Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes databases and the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED) standard terminologies recommended by the OMOP CDM. The database-table relationships were newly defined through SNOMED standard terminology concepts. The standardized data were inserted into the CDM tables. For evaluation, 100 reports were randomly selected and independently annotated by a medical informatics expert and a nurse.

resultsWe examined and standardized 1848 immunohistochemical study reports, 3890 molecular study reports, and 12,352 pathology reports of surgical specimens (from 2017 to 2018). The constructed and updated database contained the following extracted colorectal entities: (1) NOTE_NLP, (2) MEASUREMENT, (3) CONDITION_OCCURRENCE, (4) SPECIMEN, and (5) FACT_RELATIONSHIP of specimen with condition and measurement.

conclusionsThis study aimed to prepare CDM data for a research platform to take advantage of all omics clinical and patient data at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital for colon cancer pathology. A more sophisticated preparation of the pathology data is needed for further research on cancer genomics, and various types of text narratives are the next target for additional research on the use of data in the CDM.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsDatabases, FactualElectronic Health RecordsHumansMedical InformaticsMedical Oncologyclinical datacolon cancercommon data modelelectronic health recordnatural language processingoncologyoncology modulepathology

Identifiers

PMID33295294
PMCPMC7758167
OpenAlexW3099905215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.