Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33295245›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of social psychiatry2022

Phone-based outpatients' follow-up in mental health centers during the COVID-19 quarantine.

Alessandro Gentile, Julio Torales, Marcelo O'Higgins, Pamela Figueredo, Joao Mauricio Castaldelli-Maia, Domenico De Berardis, Annamaria Petito, Antonello Bellomo, Antonio Ventriglio

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of social psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. In this together: Psychological wellbeing of foreign workers in the United Arab Emirates during the COVID-19 pandemic.International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Alessandro GentileDepartment of Mental Health, ASREM, Termoli, Vasto, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4839-489X
Julio ToralesDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medical Sciences, National University of Asunción, Paraguay.ORCID 0000-0003-3277-7036
Marcelo O'HigginsDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medical Sciences, National University of Asunción, Paraguay.ORCID 0000-0002-8257-0183
Pamela FigueredoDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medical Sciences, National University of Asunción, Paraguay.
Joao Mauricio Castaldelli-MaiaDepartment of Psychiatry, Medical School, University of São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9621-2291
Domenico De BerardisDepartment of Mental Health, ASL 4 Teramo, Abruzzo, Italy.
Annamaria PetitoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7788-3591
Antonello BellomoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Italy.
Antonio VentriglioDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3934-7007
Universidad Nacional de Asunción · PYUniversity of Foggia · ITUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Teramo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current COVID-19 pandemic is affecting mental health of global population and, particularly, of people suffering from preexisting mental disorders.

aimsThis study aims to report on findings from a phone-based clinical follow-up conducted in two large catchment areas in Italy and Paraguay, during the COVID-19 lockdown, in order to provide psychiatric assessments and measure the level of stress related to the quarantine in a large sample of psychiatric outpatients.

methodsA clinical phone-based follow-up has been conducted in two large catchment areas in the province of Chieti (Vasto, Italy) and City of Asunción (Paraguay), during the COVID-19 national lockdown. The following rating scales have been employed: Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A); Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D); 18-items Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS-18). The psychological distress related to the outbreak has been assessed employing the Impact of Event Scale - Revised (IES-R).

resultsA total of 110 outpatients were consecutively included and followed among those reporting a stable phase of illness before the COVID-19 lockdown. Findings confirmed a significant increase of general psychopathology, anxiety and fear as well as mild levels of stress related to the quarantine. Also, significant weight gain during the lockdown was detected among patients.

conclusionsThis study confirmed the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on mental health of people suffering from psychiatric disorders and may also add evidence on the employment of digital psychiatry in the current pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19AnxietyCommunicable Disease ControlDepressionFollow-Up StudiesHumansMental HealthOutpatientsPandemicsQuarantineSARS-CoV-2COVID-19lockdownmental healthpandemicstresstelemedicinetelepsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID33295245
PMCPMC7726626
OpenAlexW3112556584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.