ReviewPatterns (New York, N.Y.)2020
Model-Driven Decision Making in Multiple Sclerosis Research: Existing Works and Latest Trends.
Review in Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiple sclerosis clinical decision support system based on projection to reference datasets.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2022Trial
- Scoping review of clinical decision support systems for multiple sclerosis management: Leveraging information technology and massive health data.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- An extensible and unifying approach to retrospective clinical data modeling: the BrainTeaser Ontology.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2024Article
- Building digital patient pathways for the management and treatment of multiple sclerosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Digital Twins for Multiple Sclerosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurological disorder that strikes the central nervous system. Due to the complexity of this disease, healthcare sectors are increasingly in need of shared clinical decision-making tools to provide practitioners with insightful knowledge and information about MS. These tools ought to be comprehensible by both technical and non-technical healthcare audiences. To aid this cause, this literature review analyzes the state-of-the-art decision support systems (DSSs) in MS research with a special focus on model-driven decision-making processes. The review clusters common methodologies used to support the decision-making process in classifying, diagnosing, predicting, and treating MS. This work observes that the majority of the investigated DSSs rely on knowledge-based and machine learning (ML) approaches, so the utilization of ontology and ML in the MS domain is observed to extend the scope of this review. Finally, this review summarizes the state-of-the-art DSSs, discusses the methods that have commonalities, and addresses the future work of applying DSS technologies in the MS field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.