Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33294604›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2020

Patient-Reported Use of the After Visit Summary in a Primary Care Internal Medicine Practice.

Sarita Pathak, Gregory Summerville, Celia P Kaplan, Sarah S Nouri, Leah S Karliner

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06730737 (Brief Lifestyle Medicine Preventive Randomized Prospective Interactive Educational Intervention in the Primary Care Clinic), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06730737 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Brief Lifestyle Medicine Preventive Randomized Prospective Interactive Educational Intervention in the Primary Care Clinic

TypeinterventionalSponsorTrinity Health-LivoniaRan2025 to 2026Enrolled350ConditionsPrevention Harmful Effects, Health Maintenance, Preventive Health Care, Dietary HabitsArmsVideo preventive education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Safety-netting communication during telephone consultations: an observational study using recorded consultations.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. US food allergy patients' experiences, priorities, and needs: A qualitative study.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2025
    Article
  5. Finding the Value: Identifying the Key Elements of Recorded Clinic Visits From the Perspective of Patients, Clinicians, and Caregivers.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarita PathakDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5856-1036
Gregory SummervilleDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Celia P KaplanDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Sarah S NouriDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Leah S KarlinerDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

VARC CoreP30AG044281 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Louise C. Walter · 2013 to 2026
$19.9M
Computer-Facilitated 5A's for Smoking Cessation in Primary CareR01DA034253 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SATTERFIELD, JASON M · 2012 to 2016
$2.9M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG044281NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA034253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Participants completed a cross-sectional survey about their use of the after visit summary (AVS) at a previous primary care visit. Of 355 participants, 294 (82.8%) recalled receiving it, 67.4% consulted it, 45.9% consulted it more than once, and 31.6% shared the AVS. In multivariable analysis, higher education and older age were associated with AVS consultation. Among the subset of 133 patients recalling personalized free-text instructions, 96% found them easy to understand and 94.4% found them useful. Our findings suggest that the AVS is a useful communication tool and improvement efforts should emphasize clarity for those most vulnerable to communication errors.

Indexed as

communicationhealth literacypatient educationquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID33294604
PMCPMC7705830
OpenAlexW2978619638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.