ArticleAIMS public health2020
Breaking bad news: Awareness and practice among Sudanese doctors.
Article in AIMS public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breaking bad news: a cross-sectional study assessing SPIKES protocol adherence and other methods employed among medical doctors in Nigeria.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- A scoping review of clinical communication in cancer care in Africa.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Evaluating Physicians' Experiences and Compliance with the SPIKES Protocol for Communicating Adverse News: A Cross-sectional Study Conducted in Muscat, Oman.Oman medical journal · 2025Article
- Sharing Unpleasant Health Information with Patients: A baseline study exploring physician attitudes, practices and adherence to the SPIKES protocol at a tertiary hospital in Muscat, Oman.Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2024Article
- Article
- Breaking bad news: A mix methods study reporting the need for improving communication skills among doctors in Pakistan.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Health professionals' views and experiences of breaking bad news in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a scoping review.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Examining Saudi Physicians' Approaches to Communicate Bad News and Bridging Generational Gaps.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Breaking Bad News of a Cancer Diagnosis: A Mixed-Methods Study of Patients' Perspectives.Patient preference and adherence · 2022Article
- A Literature Review of Nurses Challenges and Barriers in Assisting Patients and Families Facing Breaking Bad News.Indian journal of palliative careReview
- Physicians' Knowledge, Attitude and Practice toward Ethical and Medical Issues of Palliative Care in Suez Canal University Hospital.Indian journal of palliative careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreaking bad news is an important task for doctors in different specialties. The aim of the study was to assess adherence of Sudanese doctors to the SPIKES protocol in breaking bad news.
methodsA descriptive cross-sectional study recruited 192 doctors, at Wad Medani teaching hospital, Sudan. A questionnaire-based on SPIKES protocol was distributed among 10 departments in our hospital. Data were analyzed using SPSS and Microsoft excel.
resultsThere were (n = 101, 52.6%) females and (n = 91, 47.4%) males among the participants. 95.3% have been involved in breaking bad news, but only 56.3 received education and training about this issue. 43% admitted bad experience in breaking bad news, while 65.6% mentioned that bad news should be delivered directly to patients. The majority (>90%) agreed training is needed in the area of breaking bad news. Usual adherence to the SPIKES protocol was reported in a range of 35-79%, sometimes adherence was reported in a range of 20-44% while never adherence was reported in a range of zero-13.5%. Consultants, registrars, obstetrician and gynecologists and surgeons achieved high scores in breaking bad news. Training is an important factor in achieving high score in SPIKES protocol. The unadjusted effect of background factors on SPIKES score, showed that only training has significant impact on protocol adherence (P = 0.034, unadjusted; and P = 0.038 adjusted).
conclusionLarge number of Sudanese doctors will try to adhere to SPIKES protocol. Training is an important factor in the success of breaking bad news.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.