ArticleImmunoTargets and therapy2020
Development of Anti-
Article in ImmunoTargets and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- In Vitro Selection of Antibodies TargetingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Protective outcomes of high-affinity monoclonal antibodies against drug-resistant plague strains.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of human antibodies from vaccinated volunteers for protection againstMicrobiology spectrum · 2024Article
- Characterization of two affinity matured Anti-Yersinia pestis F1 human antibodies with medical countermeasure potential.PloS one · 2024Article
- Development ofACS omega · 2023Article
- Direct selection of functional fluorescent-protein antibody fusions by yeast display.PloS one · 2023Article
- Healthy humans can be a source of antibodies countering COVID-19.Bioengineered · 2022Article
- Review
- Optimised Heterologous Expression and Functional Analysis of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Construction, characterization and crystal structure of a fluorescent single-chain Fv chimera.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
methodsHere, we describe a set of human monoclonal immunoglobulins (IgG1s) targeting
resultsTwo of our anti-F1 IgG (αF1Ig 2 and αF1Ig 8) stood out for high production yield, specificity, and stability. These two antibodies were additionally attractive in that they displayed picomolar affinity, did not compete when binding
conclusionThese antibodies are amenable to the development of accurate and sensitive diagnostics and immuno/radioimmunotherapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.