ArticleRespiratory medicine case reports2020
A 68-year-old woman with a diagnosis of asthma and multiple fleeting pulmonary nodules- a case report.
Article in Respiratory medicine case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical characteristics of diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia.ERJ open research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell (DIPNECH syndrome) remains unfamiliar to most clinicians even though it was first described almost 30 years ago. Diagnosis is usually confirmed histopathologically after lung biopsy, but often, a diagnosis or suspected diagnosis can be made radiographically. In this paper, we present a case report of a 68-year-old female with shortness of breath and fleeting pulmonary nodules observed on chest CT scan. She was initially misdiagnosed with asthma based on an abnormal pulmonary function test which revealed an obstructive ventilatory defect. The classic radiographic findings of DIPNECH syndrome and the typical patient demographics that should arouse suspicion of a DIPNECH diagnosis were also illustrated. DIPNECH syndrome is a clinicopathological syndrome whereas focal NECH is a pathological diagnosis that is often made incidentally on histological examination and is encountered in a variety of settings, including in resected carcinoid tumors, in the context of reactive changes concomitant with infection, in metastatic cancer, radiation pneumonitis, intra-lobar sequestration, smokers, interstitial lung disease, and lung adenocarcinoma. There are no proven treatments for DIPNECH syndrome. In patients with obstructive ventilatory symptoms, bronchodilators with inhaled steroids are usually prescribed. Some severe cases may require parenteral steroids. Somatostatin analogs (SSA) have also been used in some cases with mixed results. Rapamycin has been used in several cases based on the purported activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) in DIPNECH. Some patients with large carcinoid tumors may benefit from resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.