ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2020
Identifying Mouse Autoimmune Uveitis from Fundus Photographs Using Deep Learning.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- AI-assisted diagnosis of neuro-ophthalmic disorders: a systematic review from optic neuritis to papilledema.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Pooled it
- A Hybrid Deep Learning Construct for Detecting Keratoconus From Corneal Maps.Translational vision science & technology · 2021Article
- Quantitative Assessment of Experimental Ocular Inflammatory Disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To develop a deep learning model for objective evaluation of experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU), the animal model of posterior uveitis that reveals its essential pathological features via fundus photographs. Methods: We developed a deep learning construct to identify uveitis using reference mouse fundus images and further categorized the severity levels of disease into mild and severe EAU. We evaluated the performance of the model using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and confusion matrices. We further assessed the clinical relevance of the model by visualizing the principal components of features at different layers and through the use of gradient-weighted class activation maps, which presented retinal regions having the most significant influence on the model. Results: Our model was trained, validated, and tested on 1500 fundus images (training, 1200; validation, 150; testing, 150) and achieved an average AUC of 0.98 for identifying the normal, trace (small and local lesions), and disease classes (large and spreading lesions). The AUCs of the model using an independent subset with 180 images were 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99-1.00), 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94-0.99), and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.90-1.00) for the normal, trace and disease classes, respectively. Conclusions: The proposed deep learning model is able to identify three severity levels of EAU with high accuracy. The model also achieved high accuracy on independent validation subsets, reflecting a substantial degree of generalizability. Translational Relevance: The proposed model represents an important new tool for use in animal medical research and provides a step toward clinical uveitis identification in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.