ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2020
Identification of metabolic biomarkers to predict treatment outcome and disease progression in multiple myeloma.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lipidomic profiling of plasma from patients with multiple myeloma receiving bortezomib: an exploratory biomarker study of JCOG1105 (JCOG1105A1).Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2025Trial
- Plasma Cell Myeloma: Biochemical Insights into Diagnosis, Treatment, and Smart Nanocarrier-Based Therapeutic Development.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Metabolomic biomarkers in liquid biopsy: accurate cancer diagnosis and prognosis monitoring.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The relationship between metabolites and multiple myeloma (MM) is becoming a research focus in the field. In this study, we performed metabolic profiling of multiple myeloma and identified potential metabolites associated with clinical characteristics, therapeutic efficacy, and prognosis of the disease. Fifty-five patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma and thirty-seven healthy controls from August 2016 to October 2017 were randomly collected. The serum metabolic profiling was investigated by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) technique and underwent statistical analysis. Twenty-seven metabolites were found to be significantly different between healthy controls and multiple myeloma patients. Eleven metabolites were significantly elevated, while sixteen metabolites were decreased in the multiple myeloma population. Metabolic changes were also observed in patients with renal impairment and bone destruction. Levels of urea were significantly decreased after treatment while levels of hypotaurine showed significant increase in the good-effect group (P<0.05), but not in the no-good-effect group (P>0.05). In multivariate statistical analyses, high cysteine and high hypotaurine are independent risk factors for poor treatment outcome. After adjustment for critical clinical characteristics, patients with high levels of glycolic acid and xylitol were found to be less likely to experience disease progression. Multiple myeloma demonstrates different metabolic characteristics compared with the healthy population. Among multiple myeloma patients, renal impairment and bone destruction showed additional metabolic characteristics. Cysteine and hypotaurine have value in predicting the treatment outcome, while glycolic acid and xylitol may be important prognostic factors for multiple myeloma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33294278PMC7716146W3112915674What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.