ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2020
Comparison of incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma between chronic hepatitis B patients with cirrhosis treated with entecavir or tenofovir in Taiwan - a retrospective study.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of tenofovir versus entecavir for preventing hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B patients: an umbrella review and meta-analysis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of tenofovir and entecavir in patients with chronic hepatitis B-related cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Tenofovir vs Entecavir Treatment for Chronic Hepatitis B Virus: A Reconstructed Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis.JAMA network open · 2022Pooled it
- Cost-Utility Analysis of Tenofovir Alafenamide and Entecavir in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients: A Markov Decision Model.Cancers · 2024Article
- Older Age and High α-Fetoprotein Predict Higher Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Chronic Hepatitis-B-Related Cirrhotic Patients Receiving Long-Term Nucleos(t)ide Analogue Therapy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Review
- Tenofovir is superior to entecavir in reducing HCC for patients with HBV-related compensated cirrhosis at high HCC risk scores.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2022Article
- APASL guidance on stopping nucleos(t)ide analogues in chronic hepatitis B patients.Hepatology international · 2021Article
- Entecavir versus tenofovir in patients with chronic hepatitis B: Enemies or partners in the prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2021Review
- Interplay Between Non-Canonical NF-κB Signaling and Hepatitis B Virus Infection.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Whether tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is superior to entecavir in lowering the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development remains controversial. This retrospective study compared the incidences of HCC, cirrhotic events, and mortality between patients treated with entecavir and TDF. The study enrolled 1560 chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with cirrhosis from 2008 through 2018. All patients received entecavir or TDF monotherapy for at least 12 months before enrollment. Patients who had HCC or liver transplantation at initial treatment or within the first year of entecavir or TDF therapy were excluded. In the entire cohort, the cumulative incidence rates of HCC at 3, 5, and 10 years were 9.5%, 15.2%, and 25.4%, respectively. The entecavir group had a higher cumulative incidence of HCC than the TDF group (
Indexed as
Identifiers
33294274PMC7716174W3111411081What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.