ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2020
The real-world performance of ThyroSeqV.2 to diagnose thyroid "neoplasm requiring surgery".
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fine-needle biopsy (FNB) predicts benign or malignant thyroid nodules. For indeterminate (ITN) FNBs, commercial molecular tests may improve the diagnostic accuracy and reduce the number of operations. These tests have had limited independent implementation studies in routine clinical practice. This is a prospective observational study. At Boston Medical Center, the 1,316 consecutive FNBs were classified to one of the six categories in the Bethesda classification system. Those ITN samples were submitted for ThyroSeqV.2 next generation sequencing panel analysis. The performance of ThyroSeqV.2 to predict "neoplasm requiring surgery" (NRS) was evaluated. ThyroSeqV.2 assay was performed in 398 FNBs on 384 cytologically ITN nodules (308 Bethesda III, 47 Bethesda IV and 29 Bethesda V). The first evaluable ThyroSeq result for each nodule was used for final analysis. Seventy-seven (72.0%) of 107 patients with a high risk molecular test underwent thyroid surgery resulting in 41 NRS (53.2%) and 36 benign nodules (46.8%). Of the 249 patients with a low risk or negative molecular analysis, 51 (20.5%) had surgery revealing 47 benign nodules (92.2%) and 4 NRS (7.8%). Based on surgical outcome of 128 ITN with evaluable ThyroSeq results, this molecular test had a sensitivity of 91% (95% CI: 79%-98%), specificity of 56% (45%-67%), positive predictive value (PPV) of 53% (42%-65%), negative predictive value (NPV) of 92% (81%-98%), and an overall accuracy of 69% (55%-85%) with a prevalence of NRS of 35% (27%-44%). ThyroSeqV.2 in this clinical use study in ITN nodules provided a similar NPV but a lower PPV than expected compared to published studies due to the detection of an array of mutations in benign nodules. The NPV of 92.0% for ITN cytology confirmed its utility as a "rule-out" test to exclude NRS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33294271PMC7716163W3112229263What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.