Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33294207›Full record

ArticleDigital health

The feasibility of using smartphone apps to manage self-harm and suicidal acts in adolescents admitted to an inpatient mental health ward.

Frank Muscara, Olivia Ng, Louise Crossley, Sinh Lu, Lauren Kalisch, Glenn Melvin, Sam Gronow, Chidambaram Prakash, Vicki Anderson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Frank MuscaraBrain and Mind, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5568-8450
Olivia NgBrain and Mind, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Louise CrossleyBrain and Mind, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Sinh LuBrain and Mind, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Lauren KalischBrain and Mind, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Glenn MelvinSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6958-3908
Sam GronowBanksia Inpatient Ward, The Royal Children's Hospital, Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Chidambaram PrakashBanksia Inpatient Ward, The Royal Children's Hospital, Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Vicki AndersonBrain and Mind, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Royal Children's Hospital · AUDeakin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study is to assess the feasibility (uptake, retention and adherence) and acceptability of a combination of smartphone apps to deliver a digitized safety plan,

methodsParticipants in this pre-post pilot study included 20 adolescents between 13-18 years, presenting with self-harming or suicidal behaviors in an inpatient psychiatric ward at a tertiary pediatric hospital. Participants were familiarized with the apps and completed baseline measures prior to discharge. They used the apps for six weeks before completing the follow-up survey, which measured feasibility and acceptability of the apps, as well as suicide resilience.

resultsSeventeen participants completed the pilot. Most of the sample accessed both apps at least once, three accessed the BeyondNow safety plan five times or more, and six used the BlueIce toolbox five times or more. A total of 73.5% of the sample that experienced a crisis used at least one of the apps at least once. Forty seven percent felt that the apps would not keep them safe when in crisis, although almost all of the sample rated both apps as easy to use (94% for BeyondNow, and 82% for BlueIce). Medium to large effect sizes were also found with regard to improvements in suicide resilience.

conclusionBoth apps were found to be feasible and acceptable in this population, and easy to use, although no conclusions can be drawn regarding the clinical efficacy of the apps.

Indexed as

adolescentsappsdeliberate self-harmDigital Interventionsafety planningsuicidal behaviors

Identifiers

PMID33294207
PMCPMC7705813
OpenAlexW3110254719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.