Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33294187›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2020

Risk analyses in the intersection between patient and workplace safety: A case study of hazids in para-clinical supporting systems in specialized health care.

Marianne Palm, Leif Moen, Geir Sverre Braut

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 73% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marianne PalmOslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Leif MoenStavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Geir Sverre BrautStavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3337-4792
Stavanger University Hospital · NOOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim is to investigate the appropriateness of hazid for performing risk analyses in supporting systems in hospitals.

methodsWe used a case study approach for evaluating introduction of hazid for the first time in two different university hospital settings. The hazid was performed in a customized way according to the specific needs at the two sites.

findingsIn both settings studied, the hazid approach revealed several phenomena that were followed up in the ordinary quality improvement work. The results were widely acknowledged as valid as seen from the managerial level. The participants reported that they felt comfortable in the hazid process and were able to freely present their current concerns and perspectives on risks related to their daily work.

conclusionHazid is basically a meeting between competent workers who elaborate on their own risk picture. It is giving other types of information not gained through other often-used approaches. Specific risk factors can be described in real time as seen by people directly involved, thus circumventing the hierarchy in the organization. The process in itself can trigger improvement actions. APPLICATION TO PRACTICE: Hazid can be used for presenting a valid risk picture as seen from below in the organization.

Indexed as

hazidRisk analysissupport systems in hospitals

Identifiers

PMID33294187
PMCPMC7705811
OpenAlexW3106841308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.