Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33294134›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2020

Combining structure and genomics to understand antimicrobial resistance.

Tanushree Tunstall, Stephanie Portelli, Jody Phelan, Taane G Clark, David B Ascher, Nicholas Furnham

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Prediction of pyrazinamide resistance inJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. AI-Driven Enhancements in Drug Screening and Optimization.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Using Graph-Based Signatures to Guide Rational Antibody Engineering.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Distinguishing between PTEN clinical phenotypes through mutation analysis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tanushree TunstallDepartment of Infection Biology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
Stephanie PortelliComputational Biology and Clinical Informatics, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Australia.
Jody PhelanDepartment of Infection Biology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
Taane G ClarkDepartment of Infection Biology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
David B AscherComputational Biology and Clinical Informatics, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Australia.
Nicholas FurnhamDepartment of Infection Biology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
University of London · GBBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute · AU

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K020420/1Medical Research Council MR/M01360X/1Medical Research Council MR/M026302/1Medical Research Council MR/N010469/1Medical Research Council MR/R020973/1Medical Research Council MR/R025576/1Medical Research Council MR/T000171/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobials against bacterial, viral and parasitic pathogens have transformed human and animal health. Nevertheless, their widespread use (and misuse) has led to the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) which poses a potentially catastrophic threat to public health and animal husbandry. There are several routes, both intrinsic and acquired, by which AMR can develop. One major route is through non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) in coding regions. Large scale genomic studies using high-throughput sequencing data have provided powerful new ways to rapidly detect and respond to such genetic mutations linked to AMR. However, these studies are limited in their mechanistic insight. Computational tools can rapidly and inexpensively evaluate the effect of mutations on protein function and evolution. Subsequent insights can then inform experimental studies, and direct existing or new computational methods. Here we review a range of sequence and structure-based computational tools, focussing on tools successfully used to investigate mutational effect on drug targets in clinically important pathogens, particularly

Indexed as

Antimicrobial resistanceGenome wide association studiesMachine learningPathogen surveillanceStructural bioinformaticsTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID33294134
PMCPMC7683289
OpenAlexW3096435623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.