Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33294103›Full record

ReviewThe Pan African medical journal2020

Social approaches to COVID-19 pandemic response: effectiveness and practicality in sub-Saharan Africa.

Uchenna Anderson Amaechi, Babasola Olufemi Sodipo, Chukwudi Arnest Nnaji, Ayomide Owoyemi, Kasarachi Omitiran, Ijeoma Nkem Okedo-Alex, Ejemai Eboreime, Olufemi Ajumobi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Pan African medical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on social and economic welfare in Uganda.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. An Assessment of Systemic Factors and COVID-19 Mortality in Africa.International journal of public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Uchenna Anderson AmaechiStrategy, Investment and Impact Division, Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, Geneva, Switzerland.
Babasola Olufemi SodipoHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, United States of America.
Chukwudi Arnest NnajiSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Ayomide OwoyemiDepartment of Biomedical and Health Information Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, United States of America.
Kasarachi OmitiranLumiere Health Research Consulting, Abuja, Nigeria.
Ijeoma Nkem Okedo-AlexDepartment of Community Medicine, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital Abakaliki, Nigeria.
Ejemai EboreimeNational Primary Health Care Development Agency (NPHCDA), Abuja, Nigeria.
Olufemi AjumobiSchool of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionthe threat of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic to health systems and communities in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is enormous. Social approaches such as distancing measures are essential components of the public health response to respiratory-related infectious disease outbreaks. Due to socio-economic and broader peculiarities of SSA countries, social approaches that were effective elsewhere may have limited practicality in these contexts, and if practical; may yield different or even adverse results. We highlighted the effectiveness of these social approaches and their practicality in SSA.

methodswe conducted a comprehensive literature search through multiple databases, to identify articles relevant to social distancing. Findings were thematically summarized.

resultsour review found emerging and varying empirical evidence on the effectiveness of social approaches in the control and mitigation of the COVID-19 pandemic; thus, limiting its applicability in SSA contexts. Nonetheless, our review demonstrates that the effectiveness and practicality of social approaches in SSA contexts will depend on available resources; timing, duration, and intensity of the intervention; and compliance. Weak political coordination, anti-science sentiments, distrust of political leaders and limited implementation of legal frameworks can also affect practicality.

conclusionto overcome these challenges, tailoring and adaptation of these measures to different but unique contexts for maximum effectiveness, and investment in social insurance mechanisms, are vital.

Indexed as

Physical DistancingQuarantineAfrica South of the SaharaCOVID-19Humanscommunity mitigationmass gatheringnon-pharmaceutical interventionschoolSocial distancingworkplace

Identifiers

PMID33294103
PMCPMC7704349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.