Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33294095›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2020

Students Who Analyze Their Own Data in a Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience (CURE) Show Gains in Scientific Identity and Emotional Ownership of Research.

Katelyn M Cooper, Matthew L Knope, Maya J Munstermann, Sara E Brownell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Fostering student authorship skills in synthetic biology.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Fly-CURE, a multi-institutional CURE usingJournal of microbiology & biology education · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Can We Quantify If It's a CURE?Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katelyn M CooperSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4501.
Matthew L KnopeBiology Department, University of Hawai'i Hilo, Hilo, HI 96720.
Maya J MunstermannTropical Conservation Biology and Environmental Science Graduate Program, University of Hawai'i Hilo, Hilo, HI 96720.
Sara E BrownellResearch for Inclusive STEM Education Center, Biology Education Research Lab, School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4501.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While it has been established that course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) lead to student benefits, it is less clear what aspects of CUREs lead to such gains. In this study, we aimed to understand the effect of students analyzing their own data, compared with students analyzing data that had been collected by professional scientists. We compared the experiences of students in a CURE investigating whether the extinction risk status of terrestrial mammals and birds is associated with their ecological traits. Students in the CURE were randomly assigned to analyze either data that they had collected or data previously collected by professional scientists. All other aspects of the student experience were designed to be identical. We found that students who analyzed their own data showed significantly greater gains in scientific identity and emotional ownership than students who analyzed data collected by professional scientists.

Identifiers

PMID33294095
PMCPMC7669282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.