Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33294069›Full record

ArticleWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2020

High compliance to ERAS protocol does not improve overall survival in patients treated for resectable advanced gastric cancer.

Mateusz Rubinkiewicz, Magdalena Pisarska, Piotr Zarzycki, Katarzyna Truszkiewicz, Jan Witowski, Michael Su, Robert Kupis, Anna Gajdosz, Michał Pędziwiatr

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. In pursuit of COVID-19 surgical risk stratification to manage a limited workforce and supplies in minimally invasive surgery.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mateusz Rubinkiewicz2 Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Magdalena Pisarska2 Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Piotr Zarzycki2 Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Katarzyna Truszkiewicz2 Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Jan Witowski2 Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Michael SuFaculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Robert KupisFaculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Anna GajdoszFaculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Michał Pędziwiatr2 Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Jagiellonian University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe ERAS (Enhanced Recovery after Surgery) protocol revolutionized perioperative care for gastrointestinal surgical procedures. However, little is known about the association between adherence to the ERAS protocol in gastric cancer surgery and the oncological outcome.

aimTo explore the relation between adherence to the ERAS protocol and the oncological outcome in gastric cancer patients. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of patients treated for gastric cancer between 2013 and 2016. All patients were treated perioperatively with a 14-item ERAS protocol. Every patient underwent regular follow-up every 3 months for 3 years after surgery. 80% compliance to the ERAS protocol was the goal during perioperative care. Based on the level of compliance, patients were divided into group 1 and group 2 (compliance of ≥ 80% and < 80%, respectively).

resultsCompliance to the ERAS protocol was not a risk factor for diminished overall survival - probability of 3-year survival was 63% in group 1 and 56% in group 2 (p = 0.75). The proportional Cox model revealed that only stage III gastric cancer was a risk factor of poor prognosis in patients operated on for gastric cancer (HR = 7.89, 95% CI: 2.96-20.89; p = 0.0001).

conclusionsHigh adherence to the ERAS protocol did not improve overall survival in our 3-year observation. Only the stage of the disease, according to the AJCC classification, was identified as a risk factor for poor prognosis.

Indexed as

adherenceenhanced recovery after surgerygastrectomygastric cancerlaparoscopy

Identifiers

PMID33294069
PMCPMC7687667
OpenAlexW3008363118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.