Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33294065›Full record

ArticlePharmacy practice

Preceptor tips for navigating generational differences with introductory and advanced pharmacy practice experience students.

Melinda J Burnworth, Tracy K Pettinger, Melissa S Medina, Mary Niemczyk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Melinda J BurnworthPharmD, BCPS. Professor of Pharmacy Practice. Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Midwestern University. Glendale, AZ (United States). mburnw@midwestern.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8520-0586
Tracy K PettingerPharmD. Clinical Associate Professor. Department of Pharmacy Practice and Administrative Science, College of Pharmacy, Idaho State University. Pocatello, ID (United States). Petttra1@isu.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9761-0221
Melissa S MedinaEdD. Professor and Associate Dean of Assessment & Evaluation. Department of Pharmacy: Clinical and Administrative Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Oklahoma. Oklahoma City, OK (United States). Melissa-Medina@ouhsc.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4777-6442
Mary NiemczykPhD. Associate Professor. Aviation Programs, Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University. Tempe, AZ (United States). Mary.Niemczyk@asu.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0629-1454

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ideally, precepting during introductory and advanced pharmacy practice experiences should be tailored to meet the individualized needs of learners. Understanding generational similarities and differences that exist between both learners and educators will facilitate meaningful interaction and improve learning outcomes. A common pitfall among preceptors is to judge the values of their pharmacy learners based on the stereotypes of the generations. This tends to be more evident when the preceptor's generation differs from the generation of the learner. The following article describes generational attributes that influence experiential learning with general tips for how preceptors can use this information to enhance their interactions with learners. By comparing and contrasting the predominant generations in the current pharmacy education landscape (Baby Boomers, Generation X, and Millennials), the article will demonstrate how multi-generational interactions impact pharmacy education. As Millennials are the majority of experiential learners, the focus will be on their learning preferences and how preceptors can help engage these learners. Practical advice and tools on engaging Millennial learners will be reviewed. Case vignettes will demonstrate how to identify ways to tailor precepting to meet the needs of the learner, avoid common pitfalls, facilitate meaningful interaction, and, ultimately, improve learning outcomes.

Indexed as

Age FactorsEducation, PharmacyIntergenerational RelationsInternship, NonmedicalLearningPreceptorshipStudents, PharmacyUnited States

Identifiers

PMID33294065
PMCPMC7713755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.