Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33294008›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2020

Examination of the efficacy of small genetic panels in genomic conservation of companion animal populations.

Aaron J Sams, Brett Ford, Adam Gardner, Adam R Boyko

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aaron J SamsEmbark Veterinary, Incorporated Boston MA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3800-4459
Brett FordEmbark Veterinary, Incorporated Boston MA USA.
Adam GardnerEmbark Veterinary, Incorporated Boston MA USA.
Adam R BoykoEmbark Veterinary, Incorporated Boston MA USA.
Cornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many ways, dogs are an ideal model for the study of genetic erosion and population recovery, problems of major concern in the field of conservation genetics. Genetic diversity in many dog breeds has been declining systematically since the beginning of the 1800s, when modern breeding practices came into fashion. As such, inbreeding in domestic dog breeds is substantial and widespread and has led to an increase in recessive deleterious mutations of high effect as well as general inbreeding depression. Pedigrees can in theory be used to guide breeding decisions, though are often incomplete and do not reflect the full history of inbreeding. Small microsatellite panels are also used in some cases to choose mating pairs to produce litters with low levels of inbreeding. However, the long-term impact of such practices has not been thoroughly evaluated. Here, we use forward simulation on a model of the dog genome to examine the impact of using limited marker panels to guide pairwise mating decisions on genome-wide population-level genetic diversity. Our results suggest that in unmanaged populations, where breeding decisions are made at the pairwise-rather than population-level, such panels can lead to accelerated loss of genetic diversity at genome regions unlinked to panel markers, compared to random mating. These results demonstrate the importance of genome-wide genetic panels for managing and conserving genetic diversity in dogs and other companion animals.

Indexed as

companion animalconservation geneticsdogsmicrosatellitessimulation

Identifiers

PMID33294008
PMCPMC7691451
OpenAlexW3034623336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.