ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2020
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing and Phenotypic Detection of MRSA Isolated from Diabetic Foot Infection.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proportion of toxin and non-toxin virulence factors of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from diabetic foot infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC microbiology · 2024Pooled it
- Meclizine and Cephalosporin Combination as Promising Antibiotic Drugs: Formulation, Antimicrobial, andAdvances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2025Article
- The antimicrobial and antibiofilm effects of gentamicin, imipenem, and fucoidan combinations against dual-species biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from diabetic foot ulcers.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2024Article
- Modulations of the skin microbiome in skin disorders: A narrative review from a wound care perspective.International wound journal · 2024Review
- Assessment of Antimicrobial Activity of Chitosan, ZnO, and Urtica dioica-ZnO NPs Against Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Diabetic Ulcers.Current microbiology · 2024Article
- Clinical perspectives on sampling and processing approaches for the management of infection in diabetic foot ulceration: A qualitative study.International wound journal · 2024Article
- Fighting Antibiotic Resistance: New Pyrimidine-Clubbed Benzimidazole Derivatives as Potential DHFR Inhibitors.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Heterogeneous Vancomycin IntermediateInfection and drug resistance · 2023Article
- Methicillin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A Metal-Containing NP Approach to Treat Methicillin-ResistantMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- An Overview of Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Associated Problems with Special Emphasis on Treatments with Antimicrobials.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiabetic foot infection (DFI) is a common and costly complication of diabetes that may be caused by various bacteria with multi-resistant genes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of phenotypic methods for identification of methicillin-resistant
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, swab samples were collected from patients with DFI from hospitals in Sulaimani/Iraq in April-July 2019. All the samples were processed for microbiological assessment and further MRSA phenotypic and genotypic testing.
resultsA total of 46 swab samples were collected from diabetic foot ulcers of 29 males and 17 females. Most samples (93.5%) showed positive growth, with higher proportions of monomicrobial (23; 53.5%) than mixed-bacterial infections (20; 46.5%) and
conclusion
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.