Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33293819›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2020

Preoperative Anemia and Iron Deficiency Screening, Evaluation and Management: Barrier Identification and Implementation Strategy Mapping.

Alana Delaforce, Jed Duff, Judy Munday, Janet Hardy

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06878105 (Evaluation of Fixed and Personal Assets for Patient Blood Management Implementation in CEE Countries in Practice), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06878105 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Fixed and Personal Assets for Patient Blood Management Implementation in CEE Countries in Practice

TypeobservationalSponsorSemmelweis UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled2,000ConditionsAnemia, CoagulopathyArmsData collection on interventions performs as per medical routine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. "Detect Anemia Preoperatively": A Scoping Review of Recommendations.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alana DelaforceSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3931-2875
Jed DuffSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1427-0303
Judy MundaySchool of Nursing/Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3596-5235
Janet HardyMater Health Services, South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1127-9951

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND

aimsPatients undergoing major surgery risk significant blood loss and transfusion, which increases substantially if they have pre-existing anemia. Preoperative Anemia and Iron Deficiency Screening, Evaluation and Management Pathways (PAIDSEM-P) outline recommended blood tests and treatment to optimize patients before surgery. Documented success using PAIDSEM-P to reduce transfusions and improve patient outcomes exists, but the reporting quality of such studies is suboptimal. It remains unclear what implementation strategies best support the implementation of PAIDSEM-P.

methodMaximum variation, purposive sampling was used to recruit a total of 15 participants, including a range of health professionals and patients for semi-structured interviews. Data analysis utilized a deductive approach informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) for barrier identification and the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) for reporting recommended implementation strategies. A modified version of the Action, Actor, Context, Target and Time (AACTT) framework assisted with conceptualisation and targeted strategy selection.

resultsThe analysis revealed five barriers: access to knowledge and information, patient needs and resources, knowledge and beliefs about the intervention, available resources, and networks and communications, which had strong ERIC recommendations, including conduct educational meetings, develop educational materials, distribute educational materials, obtain and use patients/consumers family feedback, involve patients/consumers/family members, conduct a local needs assessment, access new funding, promote network weaving, and organize clinician implementation team meetings.

conclusionsMapping the barriers and strategies using the ERIC framework on the basis of individual actor categories proved to be useful in identifying a pragmatic number of implementation strategies that may help in supporting the utilisation of the PAIDSEM-P and other evidence-based healthcare implementation problems more broadly.

Indexed as

Consolidated Framework for Implementing ResearchExpert Recommendations for Implementing Changepatient blood managementpreoperative anemia screeningqualitative

Identifiers

PMID33293819
PMCPMC7718960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.