ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2020
Treatment of Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.
Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Gdf15-xenobiotic receptor axis shapes NK cell maladaptation predicting cold tumors under environmental stress.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Article
- Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Mirvetuximab Soravtansine in Chinese Patients With Folate Receptor α-Positive Advanced Ovarian Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Cytoreductive surgery plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Article
- A Survival Analysis of Patients with Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Based on Relapse Type: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Study in Armenia.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Article
- Combinational use of trabectedin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for recurrent ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis of phase III randomized controlled trials.American journal of translational research · 2023Review
- Ensemble biomarkers for guiding anti-angiogenesis therapy for ovarian cancer using deep learning.Clinical and translational medicine · 2023Article
- Exploration and validation of metastasis-associated genes for skin cutaneous melanoma.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Select Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Induce Resistance to Carboplatin in Ovarian Cancer Cell Lines.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- A Weakly Supervised Deep Learning Method for Guiding Ovarian Cancer Treatment and Identifying an Effective Biomarker.Cancers · 2022Article
- CTCFL regulates the PI3K-Akt pathway and it is a target for personalized ovarian cancer therapy.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2022Article
- The Pretreatment Controlling Nutritional Status Score in Ovarian Cancer: Influence on Prognosis, Surgical Outcome, and Postoperative Complication Rate.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2022Article
- Ovarian cancer recurrence: is the definition of platinum sensitivity modified by PARPi, bevacizumab or other intervening treatments? : a clinical perspective.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer is the most common cause of death from gynecological tumors. Most patients with advanced ovarian cancer develop recurrence after concluding first-line therapy, making further lines of therapy necessary. The choice of therapy depends on various criteria such as tumor biology, the patient's general condition (ECOG), toxicity, previous chemotherapy, and response to chemotherapy. The platinum-free or treatment-free interval determines the potential response to repeat platinum-based therapy. If patients have late recurrence, i.e. > 6 months after the end of the last platinum-based therapy (i.e., they were previously platinum-sensitive), then they are usually considered suitable for another round of a platinum-based combination therapy. Patients who are not considered suitable for platinum-based chemotherapy are treated with a platinum-free regimen such as weekly paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), gemcitabine, or topotecan. Treatment for the patient subgroup which is considered suitable for platinum-based therapy but cannot receive carboplatin due to uncontrollable hypersensitivity reactions may consist of trabectedin and PLD. While the use of surgery to treat recurrence has long been a controversial issue, new findings from the DESKTOP III study of the AGO working group have drawn attention to this issue again, particularly for patients with a platinum-free interval of > 6 months and a positive AGO score. Clinical studies have also shown the efficacy of angiogenesis inhibitors such as bevacizumab and the PARP inhibitors olaparib, niraparib and rucaparib. These drugs have substantially changed current treatment practice and expanded the range of available therapies. It is important to differentiate between purely maintenance therapy after completing CTX, continuous maintenance therapy during CTX, and the therapeutic use of these substances. The PARP inhibitors niraparib, olaparib and rucaparib have already been approved for use by the FDA and the EMA. The presence of a BRCA mutation is a predictive factor for a better response to PARP inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.