ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2021
What happens to 35 week infants that receive delivery room continuous positive airway pressure?
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Portable Bedside Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in the Delivery Room Reduces Length of Stay.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2025Article
- Outcomes after delivery room positive pressure ventilation in late preterm and term infants.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- Association of delayed initiation of non-invasive respiratory support with pulmonary air leakage in outborn late-preterm and term neonates.European journal of pediatrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDelivery room (DR) continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is increasing. Our study examined the risk for neonatal morbidities after DR CPAP in 35 week neonates. STUDY
designA retrospective study of 259 infants born at 35 weeks gestational age between January 1, 2017-December 31, 2018 at a single center.
resultsDR resuscitation was administered in 30.5%, with 19.7% receiving CPAP alone. Eighty percent who received DR CPAP were admitted to the NICU. DR CPAP was associated with the highest NICU admission risk, 9.3 times the risk of those without DR positive pressure, and with respiratory conditions (RDS: OR 4.22 {CI 1.46-11.51}, TTN: OR 3.30 {CI 1.36-7.64}). For the DR CPAP group, non-invasive positive pressure was administered post resuscitation in 90%.
conclusionsIn our institution, 35 week infants frequently received DR CPAP. Of these infants, a majority were admitted to the NICU for respiratory disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.