Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33293630›Full record

SynthesisJournal of human hypertension2021

Prevalence of high blood pressure under 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Peisheng Xiong, Zhixi Liu, Meijuan Xiong, Feng Xie

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of human hypertension, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peisheng Xiong *Zhanggong District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Ganzhou, 341000, Jiangxi, PR China. 975839312@qq.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6686-0113
Zhixi Liu *Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515000, Guangdong, PR China. 842592361@qq.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2425-1168
Meijuan XiongShenzhen Cancer Hospital, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong, PR China.
Feng XieGanzhou People's Hospital, Ganzhou, 341000, Jiangxi, PR China.
Ganzhou People's Hospital · CNNanchang Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNShantou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand the prevalence of high blood pressure among the general adult population under the new diagnostic criteria. PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched. Two investigators independently performed data extraction and quality assessment, and the disagreements were resolved by consensus with a third investigator. The random-effects model was performed to pool the prevalence of high blood pressure among the population. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed to explore the source of heterogeneity. The study protocol has been registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42019147330. In total, 52 articles included in the meta-analysis with a total of 54 studies. An obvious increase in the prevalence of high blood pressure was identified by the application of new diagnostic criteria. The pooled prevalence of high blood pressure among the population was 53.01% (95% confidence interval 51.13-54.88%). Subgroup analysis showed that the WHO region, national, and age could significantly influence the prevalence of hypertension (P < 0.01). Meta-regression analyses revealed that study quality and sex ratio (male, %) did not contribute to the heterogeneity of the results (P > 0.05). The sensitivity analysis showed that the results were stable. With the use of new diagnostic criteria, the prevalence of high blood pressure has shown an upward trend, especially in Europe countries. Prevention and control measures should focus more on improving cardiovascular and cerebrovascular status in Europe countries. Standard electronic blood pressure monitors were recommended for use in future studies, and at least two more readings should be taken during a visit.

Indexed as

HypertensionAdultBlood PressureDatabases, FactualEuropeHumansMalePrevalenceRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID33293630
OpenAlexW3111320094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.