Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33293605›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Comparison of computed tomographic imaging-guided hook wire localization and electromagnetic navigation bronchoscope localization in the resection of pulmonary nodules: a retrospective cohort study.

Yu Tian, Cong Wang, Weiming Yue, Ming Lu, Hui Tian

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Clinical application of two types of Hook-Wire needle localization procedures for pulmonary small nodule biopsy.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Preoperative localization for lung nodules: a meta-analysis of bronchoscopic versus computed tomography guidance.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Advances in Diagnostic Bronchoscopy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yu TianDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, 250000, People's Republic of China.
Cong WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, People's Republic of China.
Weiming YueDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, 107# Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan, 250012, People's Republic of China.
Ming LuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, 107# Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan, 250012, People's Republic of China. lumingqilu@126.com.
Hui TianDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, 107# Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan, 250012, People's Republic of China.
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University · CNSecond Hospital of Shandong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The resection of nodules by thoracoscopic surgery is difficult because the nodules may be hard to identify. Preoperative localization of pulmonary nodules is widely used in the clinic. In this study, we retrospectively compared CT-guided hook wire localization and electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) localization of small pulmonary nodules before resection. Patients who underwent localization with CT-guided hook wire or ENB followed by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University between January 2016 and December 2019 were retrospectively included. Clinical parameters, complication and failure rate, and localization time were compared between two groups. A total of 157 patients underwent the localization procedure successfully. Pulmonary nodules were localized by CT-guided hook wire in 105 patients and by ENB in 52 patients. The nodule size in ENB group was smaller than that in CT-guided localization group (P < 0.001). Both CT-guided localization and ENB localization were well tolerated in all patients, while ENB localization leaded to less complications (P = 0.0058). In CT-guided localization group, 6 patients failed to be located while none failed in ENB group (P = 0.079). The procedure time was 15.15 ± 3.70 min for CT-guided localization and 21.29 ± 4.00 min for ENB localization (P < 0.001). CT-guided localization is simple and feasible for uncertain pulmonary nodules before surgery. ENB localization could identify small lung nodules with high accuracy and achieve lower incidence of complications.

Indexed as

BronchoscopyElectromagnetic PhenomenaFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Pulmonary NodulesRetrospective StudiesSolitary Pulmonary NoduleThoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID33293605
PMCPMC7723056
OpenAlexW3111034732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.