Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33293564›Full record

ReviewNature communications2020

Plant-based and cell-based approaches to meat production.

Natalie R Rubio, Ning Xiang, David L Kaplan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 144 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
144citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

144 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. MolluscaGenes: A Transcriptomic Database for the Mollusca.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Edible Scaffolds for Cultivated Meat Production.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Bioprocess Engineering for Cultivated Meat.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

84 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Natalie R RubioDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, 4 Colby St., Medford, 02155, Massachusetts, USA.
Ning XiangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, 4 Colby St., Medford, 02155, Massachusetts, USA.
David L KaplanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, 4 Colby St., Medford, 02155, Massachusetts, USA. david.kaplan@tufts.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9245-7774

Funding

Tissue Engineering Resource Center: TTDP41EB027062 · NIBIB · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic · 2019 to 2026
$12.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB027062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in farming technology and intensification of animal agriculture increase the cost-efficiency and production volume of meat. Thus, in developed nations, meat is relatively inexpensive and accessible. While beneficial for consumer satisfaction, intensive meat production inflicts negative externalities on public health, the environment and animal welfare. In response, groups within academia and industry are working to improve the sensory characteristics of plant-based meat and pursuing nascent approaches through cellular agriculture methodology (i.e., cell-based meat). Here we detail the benefits and challenges of plant-based and cell-based meat alternatives with regard to production efficiency, product characteristics and impact categories.

Indexed as

Foods, SpecializedMeat ProductsAgricultureAnimal WelfareBiotechnologyCell Culture TechniquesConsumer BehaviorDiet, VegetarianFood TechnologyPlant ProteinsPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID33293564
PMCPMC7722853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.