Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33293561›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Mechanism and antibacterial activity of vine tea extract and dihydromyricetin against Staphylococcus aureus.

Haiyun Liang, Keke He, Ting Li, Shumei Cui, Meng Tang, Shaoyi Kang, Wei Ma, Liya Song

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Protective Effects of Curcumin and its AnaloguesCurrent medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Haiyun LiangBeijing Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Research and Development, School of Science, Beijing Technology and Business University, No. 11 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100048, China.
Keke HeBeijing Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Research and Development, School of Science, Beijing Technology and Business University, No. 11 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100048, China.
Ting LiBeijing Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Research and Development, School of Science, Beijing Technology and Business University, No. 11 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100048, China.
Shumei CuiBeijing Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Research and Development, School of Science, Beijing Technology and Business University, No. 11 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100048, China.
Meng TangBeijing Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Research and Development, School of Science, Beijing Technology and Business University, No. 11 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100048, China.
Shaoyi KangBeijing Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Research and Development, School of Science, Beijing Technology and Business University, No. 11 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100048, China.
Wei MaBeijing Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Research and Development, School of Science, Beijing Technology and Business University, No. 11 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100048, China.
Liya SongBeijing Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Research and Development, School of Science, Beijing Technology and Business University, No. 11 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100048, China. songly@th.btbu.edu.cn.
Beijing Technology and Business University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vine tea (Ampelopsis grossedentata) has been approved as a new food ingredient in 2013. Both vine tea extract (VTE) and its active ingredient, 2R, 3R-Dihydromyricetin (DMY), showed good antibacterial activity. The mechanism of VTE and DMY against Staphylococcus aureus were evaluated by morphology observation, cell membrane and wall assay, protein assay, and DNA assay in this study. The results of SEM and TEM revealed that the VTE and DMY changed the morphology of S. aureus. The leakage of AKPase and β-galactosidase in treated groups demonstrated that the membrane integrity of S. aureus was disrupted. Meanwhile, the results of protein assay showed that VTE and DMY inhibited the expression of total proteins, and decreased activities of a few energy metabolism enzymes, total ATPase. Moreover, spectral and competitive analysis revealed that VTE and DMY interacted with DNA by groove and intercalation binding. Finally, the suspension experiments of Chinese cabbage and barley showed that inhibitors had strong inhibitory effect on bacteria growth. Overall, the results suggested that VTE and DMY may be potential food preservatives for inhibiting pathogen.

Indexed as

Alkaline PhosphataseAmpelopsisAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-GalactosidaseCell MembraneFlavonolsFood PreservationGene Expression Regulation, BacterialMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionPlant ExtractsStaphylococcus aureusAlkaline PhosphataseAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-GalactosidasedihydromyricetinFlavonolsPlant Extracts

Identifiers

PMID33293561
PMCPMC7722850
OpenAlexW3112573518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.