Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33293458›Full record

ArticleNeurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation2021

Time course of dementia following sepsis in German health claims data.

Thomas Fritze, Gabriele Doblhammer, Catherine N Widmann, Michael T Heneka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Peripheral Immune Cell Infiltration in the Hippocampus of Sepsis Mice.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas FritzeFrom the German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (T.F., G.D., C.N.W., M.T.H.), Bonn; Institute for Sociology and Demography (G.D.), University of Rostock; and Department of Neurodegenerative Disease and Geriatric Psychiatry (C.N.W., M.T.H.), University of Bonn, Germany.
Gabriele DoblhammerFrom the German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (T.F., G.D., C.N.W., M.T.H.), Bonn; Institute for Sociology and Demography (G.D.), University of Rostock; and Department of Neurodegenerative Disease and Geriatric Psychiatry (C.N.W., M.T.H.), University of Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7746-0652
Catherine N WidmannFrom the German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (T.F., G.D., C.N.W., M.T.H.), Bonn; Institute for Sociology and Demography (G.D.), University of Rostock; and Department of Neurodegenerative Disease and Geriatric Psychiatry (C.N.W., M.T.H.), University of Bonn, Germany.
Michael T HenekaFrom the German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (T.F., G.D., C.N.W., M.T.H.), Bonn; Institute for Sociology and Demography (G.D.), University of Rostock; and Department of Neurodegenerative Disease and Geriatric Psychiatry (C.N.W., M.T.H.), University of Bonn, Germany. michael.heneka@ukb.uni-bonn.de.
German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe evaluated the short-, medium-, and long-term effects of sepsis on dementia incidence using German health claims data.

methodsA total of 161,567 patients (65 years or older) were followed from 2004 to 2015 at quarterly intervals. Time since sepsis was categorized into 0 (the effective quarter of sepsis diagnosis), 1-8, and ≥9 quarters since the latest diagnosis of sepsis, taking into account admission to intensive care unit and controlling for delirium, surgery, age, sex, and comorbidities. Incident dementia was defined for all persons who did not have a validated dementia diagnosis in 2004 and 2005 and who received a first-time, valid diagnosis between 2006 and 2015.

resultsDuring the quarter of sepsis diagnosis, patients not admitted to intensive care had a 3.14-fold (95% CI 2.83-3.49) increased risk, and those with intensive care stay had a 2.22-fold (95% CI: 1.83-2.70) increased risk of receiving an incident dementia diagnosis compared with patients without sepsis. The impact of sepsis on incident dementia remained in the following 2 years, remitting only thereafter.

conclusionsFor sepsis survivors, medium-term dementia risk remains elevated, whereas long-term risk may reach the level of those without sepsis, even after controlling for delirium. These findings encourage identifying modifiable components of hospital and rehabilitation care.

Indexed as

DementiaGermanyHumansIncidenceSepsisTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID33293458
PMCPMC7803331
OpenAlexW3112584317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.