Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33293398›Full record

ReviewBMJ open2020

National primary care responses to COVID-19: a rapid review of the literature.

Victoria Haldane, Zhitong Zhang, Raja Faisal Abbas, Warren Dodd, Lincoln L Lau, Michael R Kidd, Katherine Rouleau, Guanyang Zou, Zhuo Chao, Ross E G Upshur and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Family Doctor in the "COVID-19 Era".Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Victoria HaldaneDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Zhitong ZhangDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Raja Faisal AbbasDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Warren DoddSchool of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Lincoln L LauDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Michael R KiddAustralian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Katherine RouleauDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Guanyang ZouSchool of Economics and Management, Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zhuo ChaoState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical College, Guangzhou, China.
Ross E G UpshurDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
John WalleyNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Xiaolin WeiDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada xiaolin.wei@utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3076-2650
University of Toronto · CAAustralian National University · AUGuangzhou University · CNState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease · CNUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Waterloo · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this review, conducted in April 2020, is to examine available national primary care guidelines for COVID-19 and to explore the ways in which these guidelines support primary care facilities in responding to the demands of the COVID-19 pandemic.

designRapid review and narrative synthesis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase and Google, as well as the websites of relevant national health departments, were searched from 1 January 2020 to 24 April 2020. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Documents included must be issued by a national health authority, must be specific to COVID-19 care, directed at healthcare workers or managers, and must refer to the role of primary care in the COVID-19 response.

resultsWe identified 17 documents from 14 countries. An adapted framework on primary care challenges and responses to pandemic influenza framed our analysis. Guidelines generally reported on COVID-19 service delivery and mostly made specific recommendations for ensuring continued delivery of essential primary care services through telehealth or other virtual care modalities. Few offered guidance to support surveillance as a public health function. All offered guidance on implementing outbreak control measures, largely through flexible and coordinated organisational models with partners from various sectors. There was a lack of guidance to support supply chain management and practice resilience in primary care, and lack of personal protective equipment represents a serious threat to the provision of quality care during the pandemic.

conclusionsCurrent national primary care guidelines for COVID-19 provide guidance on infection control and minimising the risk of spread in primary care practices, while supporting the use of new technology and coordinated partnerships. However, to ensure primary care practice resilience and quality of care are upheld, guidelines must offer recommendations on supply chain management and operational continuity, supported by adequate resources.

Indexed as

COVID-19Gray LiteratureHumansPandemicsPractice Guidelines as TopicPrimary Health CareSARS-CoV-2health policyinfection controlorganisation of health servicesprimary careprotocols & guidelines

Identifiers

PMID33293398
PMCPMC7725079
OpenAlexW3111761892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.