ArticleBMJ open2020
Real-world patterns of pegloticase use for treatment of gout: descriptive multidatabase cohort study.
Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biological Therapies for Urate Lowering and Inflammation Control in Gout Management.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Advances in Understanding the Mechanisms of Treatment for Gouty Arthritis: A Comprehensive Review.Physiological research · 2025Review
- Evaluation of Real-World Treatment Patterns and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Patients with Chronic Refractory Gout in the United States.Advances in therapy · 2025Article
- Polyethylene Glycol-Like Brush Polymer Conjugate of a Protein Drug Does Not Induce an Antipolymer Immune Response and Has Enhanced Pharmacokinetics than Its Polyethylene Glycol Counterpart.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePegloticase is used in severe refractory gout or in cases of intolerance to other urate-lowering therapies. We sought to evaluate the patterns of pegloticase use in the USA and the incidence of safety outcomes.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective descriptive study using data from two US commercial insurance claims databases (2010-2018). We identified new initiators of pegloticase with ≥1 gout diagnosis code in the 365-day baseline period prior to pegloticase initiation. We measured the number and duration of pegloticase infusions. We assessed the risk of anaphylaxis or anaphylactoid reactions, cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction or stroke, and hospitalisation for heart failure (new onset or exacerbations) while undergoing pegloticase therapy.
resultsAmong 2.9 million patients with ≥1 diagnosis of gout, we identified only 483 (179 in Optum and 304 in MarketScan) pegloticase initiators. The mean age and % female was 55.6 years, 10.9% for MarketScan and 60.6 years and 17.3% for Optum. Hypertension was present in up to 85%, diabetes mellitus in 38%, chronic kidney disease in 46% and heart failure in 21% of the patients. The median number of infusions was four and the duration of therapy was 3 months. During the mean 0.5-year follow-up time on pegloticase, there were 3 (0.6%) anaphylaxis, 7 (1.4%) composite cardiovascular, 31 (6.4%) heart failure hospitalisations and 3 (0.6%) deaths.
conclusionPegloticase is rarely used in gout, and the median duration of pegloticase therapy was 3 months. There were few anaphylaxis events captured in this claims-based study, while heart failure hospitalisations were common.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.