Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33293308›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Comparison of ARIMA model and XGBoost model for prediction of human brucellosis in mainland China: a time-series study.

Mirxat Alim, Guo-Hua Ye, Peng Guan, De-Sheng Huang, Bao-Sen Zhou, Wei Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Dynamic Modeling of Prevention and Control ofTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Agent-basedFrontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mirxat AlimDepartment of Epidemiology, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Guo-Hua YeDepartment of Epidemiology, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Peng GuanDepartment of Epidemiology, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0190-7301
De-Sheng HuangDepartment of Mathematics, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Bao-Sen ZhouDepartment of Epidemiology, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Wei WuDepartment of Epidemiology, China Medical University, Shenyang, China wuwei@cmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-5535-1682

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHuman brucellosis is a public health problem endangering health and property in China. Predicting the trend and the seasonality of human brucellosis is of great significance for its prevention. In this study, a comparison between the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model and the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model was conducted to determine which was more suitable for predicting the occurrence of brucellosis in mainland China.

designTime-series study.

settingMainland China.

methodsData on human brucellosis in mainland China were provided by the National Health and Family Planning Commission of China. The data were divided into a training set and a test set. The training set was composed of the monthly incidence of human brucellosis in mainland China from January 2008 to June 2018, and the test set was composed of the monthly incidence from July 2018 to June 2019. The mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) were used to evaluate the effects of model fitting and prediction.

resultsThe number of human brucellosis patients in mainland China increased from 30 002 in 2008 to 40 328 in 2018. There was an increasing trend and obvious seasonal distribution in the original time series. For the training set, the MAE, RSME and MAPE of the ARIMA(0,1,1)×(0,1,1)

conclusionsThe performance of the XGBoost model was better than that of the ARIMA model. The XGBoost model is more suitable for prediction cases of human brucellosis in mainland China.

Indexed as

BrucellosisChinaHumansIncidenceModels, StatisticalSeasonsepidemiologypublic health

Identifiers

PMID33293308
PMCPMC7722837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.