SynthesisBMJ open2020
Evaluating the use of telemedicine in gynaecological practice: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in Gynaecological Care: Diagnostic Innovations, Therapeutic Strategies, and Patient Outcomes.Cureus · 2026Review
- Clinical Outcomes of Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation: Face-to-Face Versus Telehealth Tuition.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Feasibility and acceptability of telemedicine in prenatal care for low-risk pregnancies: a comparative study of remote and in-person approaches in the Czech Republic.Central European journal of public health · 2025Observational
- Feasibility of Sexual Health and Contraceptive Web Services for Adolescents and Young Adults: Retrospective Study of a Pilot Program on Reunion Island.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2024Article
- Perception of Telemedicine and Remote Learning Following the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Health Education England Survey of London Obstetrics and Gynaecology Trainees.Advances in medical education and practice · 2024Article
- Status quo and future directions of digitalization in gynecology and obstetrics in Germany: a survey of the commission Digital Medicine of the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Article
- Telemedicine for Preoperative Assessment, Surgical Appointments, and Preoperative Education in Gynecological Day Surgery: An Prospective Observational Analysis.International journal of women's health · 2024Article
- Telehealth as a potential tool for outreach among women in Puerto Rico.AJOG global reports · 2023Article
- Asian Young Doctors Session at the 64th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society for Gynecologic Oncology (JSGO): Educational Initiatives in the Next Generation for a New Era after the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2023Article
- Telemedicine in prenatal care.Central European journal of public health · 2022Article
- Surgeon satisfaction and outcomes of tele-proctoring for robotic gynecologic surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2022Article
- If virtual gynecology clinics are here to stay, we need to include everyone.AJOG global reports · 2022Article
- The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Automation in the Fields of Gynaecology and Obstetrics - an Assessment of the State of Play.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2021Article
- Disruption in essential health services in Mexico during COVID-19: an interrupted time series analysis of health information system data.BMJ global health · 2021Article
- Reducing the risk of infection to patients and staff during gynaecological outpatient and ambulatory appointments.Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology · 2021Review
- Experiences in Electronic Consultation (eConsult) Service in Gynecology from a Quaternary Academic Medical Center.Journal of medical systems · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this systematic review is to examine the use of telemedicine in the delivery and teaching of gynaecological clinical practice. To our knowledge, no other systematic review has assessed this broad topic.
designSystematic review of all studies investigating the use of telemedicine in the provision of gynaecological care and education. The search for eligible studies followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and focused on three online databases: PubMed, Science Direct and SciFinder. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Only studies within gynaecology were considered for this review. Studies covering only obstetrics and with minimal information on gynaecology, or clinical medicine in general were excluded. All English language, peer-reviewed human studies were included. Relevant studies published up to the date of final submission of this review were considered with no restrictions to the publication year. DATA EXTRACTIONS AND SYNTHESIS: Data extracted included author details, year of publication and country of the study, study aim, sample size, methodology, sample characteristics, outcome measures and a summary of findings. Data extraction and qualitative assessment were performed by the first author and crossed checked by the second author. Quality assessment for each study was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.
resultsA literature search carried out in August 2020 yielded 313 records published between 1992 and 2018. Following a rigorous selection process, only 39 studies were included for this review published between 2000 and 2018. Of these, 19 assessed gynaecological clinical practice, eight assessed gynaecological education, one both, and 11 investigated the feasibility of telemedicine within gynaecological practice. 19 studies were classified as good, 12 fair and eight poor using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Telecolposcopy and abortion care were two areas where telemedicine was found to be effective in potentially speeding up diagnosis as well as providing patients with a wide range of management options. Studies focusing on education demonstrated that telementoring could improve teaching in a range of scenarios such as live surgery and international teleconferencing.
conclusionsThe results of this review are promising and demonstrate that telemedicine has a role to play in improving clinical effectiveness and education within gynaecology. Its applications have been shown to be safe and effective in providing remote care and training. In the future, randomised controlled studies involving larger numbers of patients and operators with measurable outcomes are required in order to be able to draw reliable conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.