Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33293038›Full record

Trial reportBrazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)

[Propofol-ketamine versus dexmedetomidine-ketamine for sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in pediatric patients: a randomized clinical trial].

Akram M Amer, Azza M Youssef, Hala S El-Ozairy, Ahmed M El-Hennawy

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02863861 (Comparative Study Between Propofol-Ketamine Combination and Dexmedetomidine-Ketamine Combination for Sedation in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Paediatric Patients.), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02863861 phase4completednot on this map

Comparative Study Between Propofol-Ketamine Combination and Dexmedetomidine-Ketamine Combination for Sedation in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Paediatric Patients.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAin Shams UniversityRan2016Enrolled120ConditionsUpper Gastrointestinal EndoscopyArmsDexmedetomidine-ketamine, propofol-ketamine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Akram M AmerAin-Shams University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology. Intensive Care, and Pain Management. Abbasia, Cairo, Egito. Electronic address: akram.amer@med.asu.edu.eg.
Azza M YoussefAin-Shams University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology. Intensive Care, and Pain Management. Abbasia, Cairo, Egito.
Hala S El-OzairyAin-Shams University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology. Intensive Care, and Pain Management. Abbasia, Cairo, Egito.
Ahmed M El-HennawyAin-Shams University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology. Intensive Care, and Pain Management. Abbasia, Cairo, Egito.
Ain Shams University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesDay-case pediatric sedation is challenging. Dexmedetomidine is a sedative analgesic that does not induce respiratory depression. We compared dexmedetomidine to propofol when it was added to ketamine for sedation during pediatric endoscopy, regarding recovery time and hemodynamic changes.

methodsWe enrolled 120 patients (2-7 years in age) and randomly assigned them into two groups. Each patient received intravenous (IV) ketamine at a dose of 1 mg.kg

resultsThere was no significant difference in hemodynamics between the groups. The Propofol-Ketamine (P-K) group showed significantly shorter recovery times than the Dexmedetomidine-Ketamine (D-K) group (21.25 and 29.75 minutes respectively, p <0.001). The P-K group showed more oxygen desaturation. Eleven and six patients experienced SpO

conclusionsThe P-K combination was associated with a shorter recovery time in pediatric upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, while the D-K combination showed less need for additional doses. REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinical trials.gov (NCT02863861).

Indexed as

Endoscopy, GastrointestinalAnalgesicsAnesthesia Recovery PeriodAnesthetics, CombinedAnesthetics, IntravenousBlood PressureChildChild, PreschoolDexmedetomidineFemaleHeart RateHumansHypnotics and SedativesHypotensionKetamineMaleAnalgesicsAnesthetics, CombinedAnesthetics, IntravenousDexmedetomidineHypnotics and SedativesKetamineOxygenPropofolDexmedetomidinaDexmedetomidineEndoscopiaEndoscopyPediatriaPediatricsPropofolSedaçãoSedation

Identifiers

PMID33293038
PMCPMC9373339
OpenAlexW3089546209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.