Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33292739›Full record

ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2020

Factors affecting men's support for the use of the contraceptive implant by their female intimate partners.

Kim Jonas, Moira Kalichman, Seth Kalichman, Chelsea Morroni, Catherine Mathews

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Kim JonasHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa. kim.jonas@mrc.ac.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4469-6674
Moira KalichmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Mansfield, CT, USA.
Seth KalichmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Mansfield, CT, USA.
Chelsea MorroniLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Catherine MathewsHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
South African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity of Connecticut · USUniversity of Botswana · BW

Funding

Enhanced STI/HIV Partner Notification in South AfricaR01HD074560 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI KALICHMAN, SETH C · 2013 to 2017
$2.8M
National Institute of Health R01HD074560NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD074560
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily planning services have been available at no cost in the public health settings of South Africa since 1994, and now include the long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) namely, the contraceptive implant and intra-uterine device (IUD). However, the uptake of LARCs has been declining in the recent years and little is known about the cause of the decline. In many relationships, men may influence their female intimate partner's contraceptive choices. Thus, men's involvement in reproductive health decisions and family programming may improve their support for contraceptive use, including the LARC use by their female intimate partners. This study investigated factors affecting men's support for the use of contraceptive implant by their female intimate partners.

methodsA quantitative, cross-sectional survey was conducted among adult men attending a public, primary health clinic in Cape Town, South Africa. Using a structured questionnaire, we measured men's knowledge, awareness and support of, and attitudes towards use of the contraceptive implant by their female intimate partners. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.

resultsThe sample included 65 men with a mean age of 31.2 years. Most (76.6%) believed that both men and women should be responsible for family planning. Support for general contraception use by their female intimate partners was prevalent at 80.0%, but only 33.9% reported that they would like their partners to use the implant in the future, while 35.6% were unsure and 30.5% did not support their partner's use of the implant. Factors significantly associated with men's support of their partner's future use of the contraceptive implant included men's reports that their partner wished to have another child in future, knowledge that the implant is safe for use by women who have not had children, knowledge that the implant can effectively prevent pregnancy for 3 years, and a positive attitude towards the implant's long-lasting effectiveness.

conclusionImproving men's knowledge of, and attitudes toward the contraceptive implant might increase their support for their partner's use of the implant, which in turn might promote uptake of the implant among women. The findings of our study suggest the importance of actively engaging men in reproductive health and family planning programs.

Indexed as

Contraceptive implantFamily planningImplanonImplanon NXTImplantLong-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs)MenMen’s support

Identifiers

PMID33292739
PMCPMC7685537
OpenAlexW3110131056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.