Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33292738›Full record

ArticleBMC nutrition2020

Prevalence of fermented foods in the Dutch adult diet and validation of a food frequency questionnaire for estimating their intake in the NQplus cohort.

Katherine J Li, Elske M Brouwer-Brolsma, Kathryn J Burton, Guy Vergères, Edith J M Feskens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Development and Validation of a Food Frequency Questionnaire to Assess Fermented Food Consumption in Adults.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Microbiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katherine J LiDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Department of Agrotechnology and Food Science, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 17, 6700 AA, Wageningen, Netherlands. katherine.li@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8698-7413
Elske M Brouwer-BrolsmaDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Department of Agrotechnology and Food Science, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 17, 6700 AA, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Kathryn J BurtonFood Microbial Systems Research Division, Agroscope, Federal Office for Agriculture (FOAG), Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research (EAER), Bern, Switzerland.
Guy VergèresFood Microbial Systems Research Division, Agroscope, Federal Office for Agriculture (FOAG), Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research (EAER), Bern, Switzerland.
Edith J M FeskensDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Department of Agrotechnology and Food Science, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 17, 6700 AA, Wageningen, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHumans have a long history of consuming fermented foods. However, their prevalence in human diets remains largely undetermined, and there is a lack of validated dietary assessment tools assessing the intake of different fermented products. This study aimed to identify fermented foods consumed in The Netherlands and determine the relative validity of a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) compared to multiple 24-h recalls for estimating their intake.

methodsThe validation population consisted of 809 participants (53.1 ± 11.9 years) from a Dutch observational cohort (NQplus) who completed a FFQ and multiple 24-h recalls. Fermented foods from the FFQ and recalls were identified and aggregated into conventional food groups. Percent difference in mean intakes, quintile cross-classification, Spearman's correlations, and Bland-Altman analyses were used to evaluate the agreement between the two dietary assessment methods.

resultsApproximately 16-18% of foods consumed by this population were fermented, and a further 9-14% were dishes containing a fermented ingredient. Fermented foods with the highest consumption included coffee (~ 453 g/day;~ 0.5% of daily energy intake), yoghurts (~ 88 g/day;~ 2.2%), beer (~ 84 g/day;~ 1.7%), wholegrain bread (~ 81 g/day;~ 9.4%), wine (~ 65 g/day;~ 2.7%), and cheese (~ 32 g/day;~ 5.0%). Mean percent difference between the FFQ and recalls was small for fermented beverages (coffee), breads (brown, white, wholegrain, rye), and fermented dairy (cheeses) (0.3-2.8%), but large for buttermilk and quark (≥53%). All fermented food groups had > 50% of participants classified into the same or adjacent quintile of intake (58%-buttermilk to 89%-fermented beverages). Strong Spearman's correlations (crude/energy-adjusted r

conclusionsFermented food groups with acceptable or good validity across all measures included commonly consumed foods in The Netherlands: fermented beverages (coffee), wholegrain and rye bread, and fermented dairy (cheeses). However, for less frequently consumed foods, such as quark and buttermilk, the levels of agreement were poor and estimates of intake should be interpreted with caution. This report provides the basis for developing a FFQ specific for fermented foods.

Indexed as

24-h recallDietary assessmentFermented foods; food frequency questionnaireValidation

Identifiers

PMID33292738
PMCPMC7712622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.