Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33292708›Full record

ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2020

Discontinuation and switching of postpartum contraceptive methods over twelve months in Burkina Faso and the Democratic Republic of the Congo: a secondary analysis of the Yam Daabo trial.

Abou Coulibaly, Tieba Millogo, Adama Baguiya, Nguyen Toan Tran, Rachel Yodi, Armando Seuc, Asa Cuzin-Kihl, Blandine Thieba, Sihem Landoulsi, James Kiarie and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Abou CoulibalyUnité de Surveillance Démographique et de Santé (Kaya-HDSS), Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS) , 03 B.P. 7047, Ouagadougou, 03, Burkina Faso. samsoncoul@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6015-3824
Tieba MillogoEcole doctorale Sciences de la Santé, Université Joseph KI-ZERBO, 03 B.P. 7021, Ouagadougou, 03, Burkina Faso.
Adama BaguiyaUnité de Surveillance Démographique et de Santé (Kaya-HDSS), Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS) , 03 B.P. 7047, Ouagadougou, 03, Burkina Faso.
Nguyen Toan TranUNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1211, 27, Genève, Switzerland.
Rachel YodiProgramme National de Santé de la Reproduction, Ministère de la Santé, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Armando SeucUNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1211, 27, Genève, Switzerland.
Asa Cuzin-KihlUNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1211, 27, Genève, Switzerland.
Blandine ThiebaUnité de formation et de recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Université Joseph KI-ZERBO, 03 B.P. 7021, Ouagadougou, 03, Burkina Faso.
Sihem LandoulsiUNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1211, 27, Genève, Switzerland.
James KiarieUNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1211, 27, Genève, Switzerland.
Désiré Mashinda KulimbaSchool of Public Health, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Séni KouandaUnité de Surveillance Démographique et de Santé (Kaya-HDSS), Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS) , 03 B.P. 7047, Ouagadougou, 03, Burkina Faso.
on behalf the study group
World Health Organization · CHInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé · BFUniversité Joseph Ki-Zerbo · BFUniversity of Geneva · CHUniversity of Kinshasa · CDMinistry of Public Health · CD

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWomen who use contraceptive methods sometimes stop early, use methods intermittently, or switched contraceptive methods. All these events (discontinuations and switching) contribute to the occurrence of unwanted and close pregnancies. This study aimed to explore contraceptive discontinuation and switching during the Yam-Daabo project to measure the effect of interventions on the continuation of contraceptive methods use.

methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of the Yam-Daabo trial data. We choose the discontinuation and switching of a modern contraceptive method as outcome measures. We performed a survival analysis using the Stata software package to estimate the effect of the interventions on contraceptive discontinuation. We also studied the main reasons for discontinuation and switching.

resultsIn total, 637 out of the 1120 women used at least one contraceptive method (of any type), with 267 women in the control and 370 in the intervention group. One hundred seventy-nine women of the control group used modern methods compared to 279 women of the intervention group with 24 and 32 who discontinued, respectively. We observed no statistically significant association between interventions and modern methods discontinuation and switching. However, modern methods' discontinuation was higher in pills and injectables users than implants and IUDs users. The pooled data comparison showed that, in reference to the women who had not switched while using a modern method, the likelihood of switching to a less or equal effectiveness method among the women of the control group was 3.8(95% CI: 1.8-8.0) times the likelihood of switching to a less or equal effectiveness method among the women of the intervention group. And this excess was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The main reason for discontinuation and switching was method-related (141 over 199), followed by partner opposition with 20 women.

conclusionThe results of this study show no statistically significant association between interventions and modern methods discontinuation. Discontinuation is more related to the methods themselves than to any other factor. It is also essential to set up specific actions targeting women's partners and influential people in the community to counter inhibiting beliefs.

trial registrationPan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR201609001784334, https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=1784 ).

Indexed as

DiscontinuationInterventionModern contraceptionPostpartumSwitching

Identifiers

PMID33292708
PMCPMC7686716
OpenAlexW3106599565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.