Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33292693›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2020

Pilot randomised clinical trial of an eHealth, self-management support intervention (iVERVE) for stroke: feasibility assessment in survivors 12-24 months post-event.

Dominique A Cadilhac, Nadine E Andrew, Doreen Busingye, Jan Cameron, Amanda G Thrift, Tara Purvis, Jonathan C Li, Ian Kneebone, Vincent Thijs, Maree L Hackett and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Adaptive Interventions for Enhancing Participation Poststroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Do self-management interventions improve self-efficacy and health-related quality of life after stroke? A systematic review.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. A Qualitative Exploration of Stroke Survivors' Experiences of Using a Stroke Helpline.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Dominique A CadilhacStroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Level 3 Hudson Institute Building, 27-31 Wright Street, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia. dominique.cadilhac@monash.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8162-682X
Nadine E AndrewStroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Level 3 Hudson Institute Building, 27-31 Wright Street, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Doreen BusingyeStroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Level 3 Hudson Institute Building, 27-31 Wright Street, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Jan CameronStroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Level 3 Hudson Institute Building, 27-31 Wright Street, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Amanda G ThriftStroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Level 3 Hudson Institute Building, 27-31 Wright Street, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Tara PurvisStroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Level 3 Hudson Institute Building, 27-31 Wright Street, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Jonathan C LiFaculty of Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Ian KneeboneDiscipline of Clinical Psychology, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia.
Vincent ThijsFlorey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Maree L HackettThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Natasha A LanninDepartment of Neurosciences, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Monique F KilkennyStroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Level 3 Hudson Institute Building, 27-31 Wright Street, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
ReCAPS investigators
Hudson Institute of Medical Research · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AUFlorey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health · AUUniversity of Lancashire · GB

Funding

Monash University SG516-0431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic communication is used in various populations to achieve health goals, but evidence in stroke is lacking. We pilot tested the feasibility and potential effectiveness of a novel personalised electronic self-management intervention to support person-centred goal attainment and secondary prevention after stroke.

methodsA phase I, prospective, randomised controlled pilot trial (1:1 allocation) with assessor blinding, intention-to-treat analysis, and a process evaluation. Community-based survivors of stroke were recruited from participants in the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry (AuSCR) who had indicated their willingness to be contacted for research studies. Inclusion criteria include 1-2 years following hospital admission for stroke and living within 50 km of Monash University (Melbourne). Person-centred goals were set with facilitation by a clinician using a standardised template. The intervention group received electronic support messages aligned to their goals over 4 weeks. The control group received only 2-3 electronic administrative messages. Primary outcomes were study retention, goal attainment (assessed using Goal Attainment Scaling method) and satisfaction. Secondary outcomes were self-management (Health Education Impact Questionnaire: 8 domains), quality of life, mood and acceptability.

resultsOf 340 invitations sent from AuSCR, 73 responded, 68 were eligible and 57 (84%) completed the baseline assessment. At the goal-setting stage, 54/68 (79%) were randomised (median 16 months after stroke): 25 to intervention (median age 69 years; 40% female) and 29 to control (median age 68 years; 38% female). Forty-five (83%) participants completed the outcome follow-up assessment. At follow-up, goal attainment (mean GAS-T score ≥ 50) in the intervention group was achieved for goals related to function, participation and environment (control: environment only). Most intervention participants provided positive feedback and reported that the iVERVE messages were easy to understand (92%) and assisted them in achieving their goals (77%). We found preliminary evidence of non-significant improvements between the groups for most self-management domains (e.g. social integration and support: β coefficient 0.34; 95% CI - 0.14 to 0.83) and several quality-of-life domains in favour of the intervention group.

conclusionThese findings support the need for further randomised effectiveness trials of the iVERVE program to be tested in people with new stroke.

trial registrationANZCTR, ACTRN12618001519246 . Registered on 11 September 2018-retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

eHealthFeasibility studiesHealthcare technologyStroke

Identifiers

PMID33292693
PMCPMC7648386
OpenAlexW3097717540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.