Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33292559›Full record

ArticleMovement ecology2020

Breeding habitat loss reveals limited foraging flexibility and increases foraging effort in a colonial breeding seabird.

Marwa M Kavelaars, Jan M Baert, Eric W M Stienen, Judy Shamoun-Baranes, Luc Lens, Wendt Müller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement ecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marwa M KavelaarsBehavioural Ecology and Ecophysiology (BECO) Researchgroup, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium. marwa.kavelaars@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7631-9999
Jan M BaertBehavioural Ecology and Ecophysiology (BECO) Researchgroup, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium.
Eric W M StienenResearch Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Kliniekstraat 25, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Judy Shamoun-BaranesComputational Geo-Ecology, IBED, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94248, 1090, GE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Luc LensTerrestrial Ecology Unit (TEREC), Ghent University, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Wendt MüllerBehavioural Ecology and Ecophysiology (BECO) Researchgroup, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium.
University of Antwerp · BEGhent University · BEResearch Institute for Nature and Forest · BEUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 11ZI716NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek G0E1614N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHabitat loss can force animals to relocate to new areas, where they would need to adjust to an unfamiliar resource landscape and find new breeding sites. Relocation may be costly and could compromise reproduction.

methodsHere, we explored how the Lesser black-backed gull (Larus fuscus), a colonial breeding seabird species with a wide ecological niche, responds to the loss of its breeding habitat. We investigated how individuals adjusted their foraging behaviour after relocating to another colony due to breeding site destruction, and whether there were any reproductive consequences in the first years after relocation. To this end, we compared offspring growth between resident individuals and individuals that recently relocated to the same colony due to breeding habitat loss. Using GPS-tracking, we further investigated the foraging behaviour of resident individuals in both colonies, as well as that of relocated individuals, as enhanced foraging effort could represent a potential driver of reproductive costs.

resultsWe found negative consequences of relocation for offspring development, which were apparent when brood demand was experimentally increased. Recently relocated gulls travelled further distances for foraging than residents, as they often visited more distant foraging sites used by residents breeding in their natal colony as well as new areas outside the home range of the residents in the colony where they settled.

conclusionsOur results imply that relocated individuals did not yet optimally adapt to the new food landscape, which was unexpected, given the social information on foraging locations that may have been available from resident neighbours in their new breeding colony. Even though the short-term reproductive costs were comparatively low, we show that generalist species, such as the Lesser black-backed gull, may be more vulnerable to habitat loss than expected. Long term studies are needed to investigate how long individuals are affected by their relocation in order to better assess potential population effects of (breeding) habitat loss.

Indexed as

Behavioural plasticityEarly developmentForaging behaviourGPS trackingHabitat destructionLesser black-backed gullSeabirds

Identifiers

PMID33292559
PMCPMC7653720
OpenAlexW3105134515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.