Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33292451›Full record

ArticlePatient safety in surgery2020

Evaluation of different airway tests to determine difficult intubation in apparently normal adult patients: undergoing surgical procedures.

Khaled El-Radaideh, Ehab Dheeb, Hamzeh Shbool, Saif Garaibeh, Adel Bataineh, Wail Khraise, Basil El-Radaideh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient safety in surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Expert consensus on difficult airway assessment.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Khaled El-RadaidehDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 953, Irbid, 21110, Jordan. elradk01@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2512-0936
Ehab DheebDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 953, Irbid, 21110, Jordan.
Hamzeh ShboolDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 953, Irbid, 21110, Jordan.
Saif GaraibehDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 953, Irbid, 21110, Jordan.
Adel BatainehDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 953, Irbid, 21110, Jordan.
Wail KhraiseDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 953, Irbid, 21110, Jordan.
Basil El-RadaidehIntern in the department of general surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 953, Irbid, 21110, Jordan.
Jordan University of Science and Technology · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInadequate maintenance of a patient's airway represents a major cause of anesthesia-related morbidity and mortality. This study was designed to evaluate common preoperative clinical tests to determine the risk of difficult endotracheal intubation in apparent "normal" adult patients undergoing surgical procedures.

methodsA prospective observational cohort study was performed on 160 consecutive adult patients undergoing surgical procedures at an academic medical center in Jordan from 20 May 2019 until 11 February 2020. Preoperative assessment of airway risk stratification was performed by the following clinical tests: the mandible protrusion test (MPT), thyromental (TMD) and sternomental (SMD) distances, inter-incisor gap (IIG), and the modified Mallampati tests with tongue protrusion (MMT-TP) and without tongue protrusion (MMT-NTP). Grade C on the MPT, TMD ≤ 6 cm, SMD ≤ 12 cm, and MMT grades III and IV were considered to be predictors of difficult endotracheal intubations. A modified Cormack-Lehane grading (MCLG) of laryngoscopic views with backward, upward, and right-sided pressure on the thyroid and cricoid cartilages (BURP) maneuver was also documented, with grades 2B, 3, and 4 considered to be difficult airways for intubation.

resultsFifteen patients (9.4%) were classified as MCLG 2B, 3, and 4, with age significantly associated with the MCLG grade (P = 0.028). The sensitivity and Youden's index of MMT-TP were found to be the lowest (40% and 0.29, respectively). The MPT was the most accurate and specific test (90.63 and 95.17%, respectively), with the highest PPV (50%), Youden's index (0.42), and area under the curve (AUC) (0.781). Bivariant analysis of MPT and the t-test of the mean TMDs and SMDs revealed significant associations between these airway tests and the difficulty of intubation (P values: < 0.001, 0.02, < 0.01, respectively).

conclusionThe MPT, with its highest accuracy, specificity, positive predictive value, and good sensitivity may be used as a routine screening test for preoperative prediction of difficult endotracheal intubations.

Indexed as

Airway managementCormack-LehaneDifficult intubationLaryngoscopyMandibular protrusionModified Mallampati testSternomental distanceThyromental distance

Identifiers

PMID33292451
PMCPMC7681946
OpenAlexW3109872438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.