Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33292400›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)2020

Promotion of the influenza vaccination to hospital staff during pre-employment health check: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial.

Michael Currat, Catherine Lazor-Blanchet, Giorgio Zanetti

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02758145 (Promotion of Influenza Vaccination in Healthcare Workers During the Recruitment Visit), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 81% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02758145 nacompletednot on this map

Promotion of Influenza Vaccination in Healthcare Workers During the Recruitment Visit

TypeinterventionalSponsorService de Médecine Préventive HospitalièreRan2016 to 2018Enrolled379ConditionsHuman Influenza Vaccination in Healthcare WorkersArmsFlu vaccination information in 3 phases
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael CurratService of Hospital Preventive Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Occupational Medicine Unit BH-08, Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland. michael.currat@chuv.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4094-559X
Catherine Lazor-BlanchetService of Hospital Preventive Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Occupational Medicine Unit BH-08, Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Giorgio ZanettiService of Hospital Preventive Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Occupational Medicine Unit BH-08, Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
University of Lausanne · CHUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccination is the most effective prevention of seasonal influenza. Despite its recommendation and active promotion, vaccination coverage remains low among healthcare staff. The goal of the study was to test if a pre-employment health check is a good opportunity to promote future vaccination against influenza among healthcare workers newly hired by a university hospital.

methodsAll new hospital employees active at the bedside who underwent a pre-employment health check between the end of 2016's influenza epidemic and the start of the next influenza vaccination campaign were randomly allocated to a control group or an intervention group. The intervention consisted of a semi-structured dialog and the release of an information leaflet about influenza and influenza vaccination during the check-up, and the shipment of a postcard reminder 2 weeks before the next vaccination campaign. Vaccination rates during the campaign were compared among the two groups.

resultsThree hundred fifty-seven employees were included. Vaccination rates were similar in both groups: 79/172 (46%) in the control and 92/185 (50%) in the intervention group. A significantly higher rate of vaccination was noted among physicians (70/117, 60%) than among other employees (101/240, 42%, p = 0.001). In a pre-defined exploratory analysis among physicians, the vaccination rate was higher in the intervention group (36/51, 71%) than in the control group (34/65, 52%, p = 0.046).

conclusionsPromotion of the influenza vaccine during pre-employment health check did not improve the vaccination rate of newly hired hospital healthcare workers overall during the next influenza vaccination campaign. Results suggest a favourable impact on the vaccination rate of physicians. Thus, there may be an interest in using communication strategies tailored to the different categories of healthcare workers to promote the influenza vaccine during pre-employment health check.

trial registrationClinicalTrials, NCT02758145 . Registered 26 April 2016.

Indexed as

Healthcare workersInfluenzaOccupational health serviceVaccination coverageVaccine

Identifiers

PMID33292400
PMCPMC7672907
OpenAlexW3098328927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.