Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33292330›Full record

ArticleCell division2020

Chromosomal aberration arises during somatic reprogramming to pluripotent stem cells.

Xinyu Liu, Conghui Li, Kang Zheng, Xiaofeng Zhao, Xiaofeng Xu, Aifen Yang, Min Yi, Huaping Tao, Binghua Xie, Mengsheng Qiu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell division, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Disease models of Leigh syndrome: From yeast to organoids.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2024
    Review
  7. Challenges and opportunities to bridge translational to clinical research for personalized mitochondrial medicine.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Xinyu LiuKey Laboratory of Organ Development and Regeneration of Zhejiang Province, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, 311121, Hangzhou, China.
Conghui LiKey Laboratory of Organ Development and Regeneration of Zhejiang Province, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, 311121, Hangzhou, China.
Kang ZhengKey Laboratory of Organ Development and Regeneration of Zhejiang Province, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, 311121, Hangzhou, China.
Xiaofeng ZhaoKey Laboratory of Organ Development and Regeneration of Zhejiang Province, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, 311121, Hangzhou, China.
Xiaofeng XuKey Laboratory of Organ Development and Regeneration of Zhejiang Province, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, 311121, Hangzhou, China.
Aifen YangKey Laboratory of Organ Development and Regeneration of Zhejiang Province, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, 311121, Hangzhou, China.
Min YiKey Laboratory of Organ Development and Regeneration of Zhejiang Province, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, 311121, Hangzhou, China.
Huaping TaoKey Laboratory of Organ Development and Regeneration of Zhejiang Province, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, 311121, Hangzhou, China.
Binghua XieKey Laboratory of Organ Development and Regeneration of Zhejiang Province, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, 311121, Hangzhou, China.
Mengsheng QiuKey Laboratory of Organ Development and Regeneration of Zhejiang Province, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, 311121, Hangzhou, China. msqiu@hznu.edu.cn.
Junlin YangKey Laboratory of Organ Development and Regeneration of Zhejiang Province, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, 311121, Hangzhou, China. yjl8121@hznu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3421-7166
Hangzhou Normal University · CNUniversity of Louisville · US

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31572224National Natural Science Foundation of China 31771621National Natural Science Foundation of China 81200961Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (CN) LY18H090014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReprogramming somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) has opened new therapeutic possibilities. However, karyotypic abnormalities detected in iPSCs compromised their utility, especially chromosomal aberrations found at early passages raised serious safety concerns. The mechanism underlying the chromosomal abnormality in early-passage iPSCs is not known.

methodsHuman dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) were stimulated with KMOS (KLF4, cMYC, OCT4 and SOX2) proteins to enhance their proliferative capacity and many vigorous clones were obtained. Clonal reprogramming was carried out by KMOS mRNAs transfection to confirm the 'chromosomal mutagenicity' of reprogramming process. Subculturing was performed to examine karyotypic stability of iPSCs after the re-establishment of stemness. And antioxidant N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC) was added to the culture medium for further confirmming the mutagenicity in the first few days of reprogramming.

resultsChromosomal aberrations were found in a small percentage of newly induced iPS clones by reprogramming transcription factors. Clonal reprogramming ruled out the aberrant chromosomes inherited from rare karyotypically abnormal parental cell subpopulation. More importantly, the antioxidant NAC effectively reduced the occurrence of chromosomal aberrations at the early stage of reprogramming. Once iPS cell lines were established, they restored karyotypic stability in subsequent subculturing.

conclusionsOur results provided the first line of evidence for the 'chromosomal mutagenicity' of reprogramming process.

Indexed as

Chromosomal aberrationGenetic stabilityInduced pluripotent stem cellKaryotypeReprogramme

Identifiers

PMID33292330
PMCPMC7641821
OpenAlexW3094794967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.