Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33292240›Full record

ArticleBMC proceedings2020

Building health system resilience in the context of primary health care revitalization for attainment of UHC: proceedings from the Fifth Health Sector Directors' Policy and Planning Meeting for the WHO African Region.

Prosper Tumusiime, Humphrey Karamagi, Regina Titi-Ofei, Michelle Amri, Aminata Binetou Wahebine Seydi, Hillary Kipruto, Benson Droti, Sosthene Zombre, Zabulon Yoti, Felicitas Zawaira and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC proceedings, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Prosper TumusiimeWHO Regional Office for Africa, PB 06 Cité du Djoue, Brazzaville, Congo.
Humphrey KaramagiWHO Regional Office for Africa, PB 06 Cité du Djoue, Brazzaville, Congo. karamagih@who.int.
Regina Titi-OfeiWHO Regional Office for Africa, PB 06 Cité du Djoue, Brazzaville, Congo.
Michelle AmriWHO Regional Office for Africa, PB 06 Cité du Djoue, Brazzaville, Congo.
Aminata Binetou Wahebine SeydiWHO Regional Office for Africa, PB 06 Cité du Djoue, Brazzaville, Congo.
Hillary KiprutoWHO Regional Office for Africa, PB 06 Cité du Djoue, Brazzaville, Congo.
Benson DrotiWHO Regional Office for Africa, PB 06 Cité du Djoue, Brazzaville, Congo.
Sosthene ZombreWHO Regional Office for Africa, PB 06 Cité du Djoue, Brazzaville, Congo.
Zabulon YotiWHO Regional Office for Africa, PB 06 Cité du Djoue, Brazzaville, Congo.
Felicitas ZawairaWHO Regional Office for Africa, PB 06 Cité du Djoue, Brazzaville, Congo.
Joseph CaboreWHO Regional Office for Africa, PB 06 Cité du Djoue, Brazzaville, Congo.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe recent 2018 Declaration of Astana recognized primary health care (PHC) as a means to achieve universal health coverage (UHC) and the health-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Following this declaration, country progress on operationalization of the PHC agenda and attainment of UHC has been stalled by the new challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic has also disrupted the continuity of essential health service provision and tested the resilience of the region's health systems.

methodsIn accordance with this, the WHO Regional Office for Africa convened the Fifth Health Sector Directors' Planning and Policy Meeting across the 47 Member States of the Region. The two-day forum focused on building health system resilience to facilitate service continuity during health threats, PHC revitalization, and health systems strengthening towards UHC.

resultsThe Regional Forum provided evidence on building resilient health systems in the WHO African Region and engaged participants in meaningful and critical discussion. It is from these discussions that four key themes emerged: (1) working multisectorally/intersectorally, (2) moving from fragmentation to integration, (3) ensuring implementation and knowledge exchange, and (4) rethinking resilience and embracing antifragility. These discussions and associated groupings by thematic areas lend themselves to recommendations for the WHO.

conclusionsThis paper details the proceedings and key findings on building resilient health systems, the four themes that emerged from participant deliberation, and the recommendations that have emerged from the meeting. Deliberations from the Regional Forum are critical, as they have the potential to directly inform policy and program design, given that the meeting convenes health sector technocrats, who are at the helm of policy design, action, and implementation.

Indexed as

Global healthHealth governanceHealth policyHealth systemsMultisectoral actionPrimary health carePublic policySustainable development GoalsUniversal health coverage

Identifiers

PMID33292240
PMCPMC7710773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.