Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33292208›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2020

Recognition and management of agitation in acute mental health services: a qualitative evaluation of staff perceptions.

Joshua Tucker, Lisa Whitehead, Peter Palamara, Josephine Xenia Rosman, Karla Seaman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joshua TuckerAlbany Health Campus, 30 Warden Avenue, Spencer Park, Western Australia, 6330, Australia.
Lisa WhiteheadCentre for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Services Research, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Building 21, Level 4, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, Western Australia, 6027, Australia. l.whitehead@ecu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6395-0279
Peter PalamaraCentre for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Services Research, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Building 21, Level 4, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, Western Australia, 6027, Australia.
Josephine Xenia RosmanCentre for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Services Research, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Building 21, Level 4, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, Western Australia, 6027, Australia.
Karla SeamanCentre for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Services Research, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Building 21, Level 4, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, Western Australia, 6027, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAgitation among patients is a common and distressing behaviour across a variety of health care settings, particularly inpatient mental health. Unless recognised early and effectively managed it can lead to aggression and personal injury. The aim of this paper is to explore the experiences of mental health nurses in recognising and managing agitation in an inpatient mental health setting and the alignment of these experiences with best practice and person-centred care.

methodsThis study used a descriptive qualitative methodology. Semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted with 20 nurses working in a mental health unit in 2018. Nursing staff described their experiences of assessing and managing agitation. Descriptive and Thematic Analysis were undertaken of the transcribed focus group dialogue.

resultsNurses combined their clinical knowledge, assessment protocols and training with information from patients to make an individualised assessment of agitation. Nurses also adopted an individualised approach to management by engaging patients in decisions about their care. In keeping with best practice recommendations, de-escalation strategies were the first choice option for management, though nurses also described using both coercive restraint and medication under certain circumstances. From the perspective of patient-centred care, the care provided aligned with elements of person-centred care nursing care.

conclusionThe findings suggest that clinical mental health nurses assess and manage agitation, with certain exceptions, in line with best practice and a person-centred care nursing framework.

Indexed as

AgitationAssessmentManagementMental healthNurses, person-centred careQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID33292208
PMCPMC7653876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.