Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33292184›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2020

Changing nursing practice within primary health care innovations: the case of advanced access model.

Sabina Abou Malham, Mylaine Breton, Nassera Touati, Lara Maillet, Arnaud Duhoux, Isabelle Gaboury

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sabina Abou MalhamSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Québec, Canada. sabina.abou.malham@usherbrooke.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2885-6807
Mylaine BretonCharles Lemoyne- Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean sur les innovations en santé (CR-CSIS) Research Centre, Campus Longueuil, 150 Place Charles-Lemoyne, Room 200, Longueuil, Québec, J4K 0A8, Canada.
Nassera TouatiCharles Lemoyne- Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean sur les innovations en santé (CR-CSIS) Research Centre, Campus Longueuil, 150 Place Charles-Lemoyne, Room 200, Longueuil, Québec, J4K 0A8, Canada.
Lara MailletCharles Lemoyne- Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean sur les innovations en santé (CR-CSIS) Research Centre, Campus Longueuil, 150 Place Charles-Lemoyne, Room 200, Longueuil, Québec, J4K 0A8, Canada.
Arnaud DuhouxCharles Lemoyne- Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean sur les innovations en santé (CR-CSIS) Research Centre, Campus Longueuil, 150 Place Charles-Lemoyne, Room 200, Longueuil, Québec, J4K 0A8, Canada.
Isabelle GabouryCharles Lemoyne- Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean sur les innovations en santé (CR-CSIS) Research Centre, Campus Longueuil, 150 Place Charles-Lemoyne, Room 200, Longueuil, Québec, J4K 0A8, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 399757Réseau de recherche portant sur les interventions en sciences infirmières du Québec none
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe advanced access (AA) model has attracted much interest across Canada and worldwide as a means of ensuring timely access to health care. While nurses contribute significantly to improving access in primary healthcare, little is known about the practice changes involved in this innovative model. This study explores the experience of nurse practitioners and registered nurses with implementation of the AA model, and identifies factors that facilitate or impede change.

methodsWe used a longitudinal qualitative approach, nested within a multiple case study conducted in four university family medicine groups in Quebec that were early adopters of AA. We conducted semi-structured interviews with two types of purposively selected nurses: nurse practitioners (NPs) (n = 6) and registered nurses (RNs) (n = 5). Each nurse was interviewed twice over a 14-month period. One NP was replaced by another during the second interviews. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis based on two principles of AA and the Niezen & Mathijssen Network Model (2014).

resultsOver time, RNs were not able to review the appointment system according to the AA philosophy. Half of NPs managed to operate according to AA. Regarding collaborative practice, RNs were still struggling to participate in team-based care. NPs were providing independent and collaborative patient care in both consultative and joint practice, and were assuming leadership in managing patients with acute and chronic diseases. Thematic analysis revealed influential factors at the institutional, organizational, professional, individual and patient level, which acted mainly as facilitators for NPs and barriers for RNs. These factors were: 1) policy and legislation; 2) organizational policy support (leadership and strategies to support nurses' practice change); facility and employment arrangements (supply and availability of human resources); Inter-professional collegiality; 3) professional boundaries; 4) knowledge and capabilities; and 5) patient perceptions.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that healthcare decision-makers and organizations need to redefine the boundaries of each category of nursing practice within AA, and create an optimal professional and organizational context that supports practice transformation. They highlight the need to structure teamwork efficiently, and integrate and maximize nurses' capacities within the team throughout AA implementation in order to reduce waiting times.

Indexed as

Advanced accessNurse optimizationNurses practice changePrimary health care

Identifiers

PMID33292184
PMCPMC7709259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.