Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33292083›Full record

ArticleQualitative health research2021

The Challenges of Conducting Qualitative Research on "couples" in Abusive Intimate Partner Relationships Involving Substance Use.

Beverly Love, Juliet Henderson, Amy Johnson, Danielle Stephens-Lewis, David Gadd, Polly Radcliffe, Elizabeth Gilchrist, Gail Gilchrist

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Qualitative health research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Beverly LoveKing's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0828-9876
Juliet HendersonKing's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Amy JohnsonThe University of Edinburgh, Edinbrugh, United Kingdom.
Danielle Stephens-LewisUniversity of Gloucestershire, Cheltenham, United Kingdom.
David GaddThe University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Polly RadcliffeKing's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth GilchristThe University of Edinburgh, Edinbrugh, United Kingdom.
Gail GilchristKing's College London, London, United Kingdom.
King's College London · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Gloucestershire · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-1214-20009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Undertaking qualitative dyad or couple interviews involving intimate partner abuse and substance use presents considerable ethical, safeguarding, and theoretical challenges throughout the research process from recruitment to conducting interviews and analysis. These challenges and how they were managed are outlined using the experience from a qualitative study of 14 heterosexual "couples" that explored the complex interplay between intimate partner abuse and substance use. Managing these challenges for participants, their families, and researchers included the use of safeguarding protocols and procedures to manage risk and the provision of clinical support for experienced researchers. Researchers often felt drawn into the conflicts and complex dynamics of opposing accounts from the male and females' relationship which could be emotionally and methodologically taxing. Researchers discussing their analysis and felt experiences with each other provided a reflexive space to manage emotions and stay close to the theoretical underpinnings.

Indexed as

Intimate Partner ViolenceSubstance-Related DisordersFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsMaleQualitative ResearchSexual Partnersabuseaddictiondomesticgenderqualitativereflexivitysubstance useUK

Identifiers

PMID33292083
PMCPMC7885088
OpenAlexW3111444570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.