ArticleMicroorganisms2020
Eosinopenia in COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Analysis.
Article in Microorganisms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Epidemiology, Clinical Data, and Management of Aseptic Abscess Syndrome: Review of Published Cases Outside France.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Eosinopenia as a prognostic factor of mortality for COVID-19 in end-stage kidney disease patients.Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2024Article
- Morphological abnormalities of leukocytes in SARS-CoV-2 infection.African health sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- Emerging Evidence for Pleiotropism of Eosinophils.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- A study to evaluate the role of eosinophil count as a prognostic marker for assessing the outcome in patients with COVID-19 infection.Annals of African medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.