Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33291687›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Comparison of a Deep Learning-Based Pose Estimation System to Marker-Based and Kinect Systems in Exergaming for Balance Training.

Elise Klæbo Vonstad, Xiaomeng Su, Beatrix Vereijken, Kerstin Bach, Jan Harald Nilsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Effect of Flat Running Shoes on Hip Kinematics in Male Recreational Runners.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elise Klæbo VonstadDepartment of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7034 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0419-1548
Xiaomeng SuDepartment of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7034 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5719-0456
Beatrix VereijkenDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7030 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2231-8138
Kerstin BachDepartment of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7034 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4256-7676
Jan Harald NilsenDepartment of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7034 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0930-1155

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using standard digital cameras in combination with deep learning (DL) for pose estimation is promising for the in-home and independent use of exercise games (exergames). We need to investigate to what extent such DL-based systems can provide satisfying accuracy on exergame relevant measures. Our study assesses temporal variation (i.e., variability) in body segment lengths, while using a Deep Learning image processing tool (DeepLabCut, DLC) on two-dimensional (2D) video. This variability is then compared with a gold-standard, marker-based three-dimensional Motion Capturing system (3DMoCap, Qualisys AB), and a 3D RGB-depth camera system (Kinect V2, Microsoft Inc). Simultaneous data were collected from all three systems, while participants (N = 12) played a custom balance training exergame. The pose estimation DLC-model is pre-trained on a large-scale dataset (ImageNet) and optimized with context-specific pose annotated images. Wilcoxon's signed-rank test was performed in order to assess the statistical significance of the differences in variability between systems. The results showed that the DLC method performs comparably to the Kinect and, in some segments, even to the 3DMoCap gold standard system with regard to variability. These results are promising for making exergames more accessible and easier to use, thereby increasing their availability for in-home exercise.

Indexed as

Deep LearningExercisePostural BalanceGames, RecreationalHumansMotiondeep learningexergaminghuman movementimage analysiskinectmarkerless motion capturemotion capturesegment lengths

Identifiers

PMID33291687
PMCPMC7730529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.