Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33291660›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Suitability of Biodegradable Materials in Comparison with Conventional Packaging Materials for the Storage of Fresh Pork Products over Extended Shelf-Life Periods.

Luzia M Hawthorne, Anel Beganović, Matthias Schwarz, Aeneas W Noordanus, Markus Prem, Lothar Zapf, Stefan Scheibel, Gerhard Margreiter, Christian W Huck, Katrin Bach

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Luzia M HawthorneDepartment of Food Technology and Nutrition, Management Center Innsbruck, Universitaetsstrasse 15, 6020 Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria.
Anel BeganovićInstitute for Analytical Chemistry and Radiochemistry, Leopold Franzens University of Innsbruck, Innrain 80-82, 6020 Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria.
Matthias SchwarzMULTIVAC Sepp Haggenmüller SE & Co. KG, Bahnhofstrasse 4, 87787 Wolfertschwenden, Bayern, Germany.
Aeneas W NoordanusNATURABIOMAT GmbH, Oberer Feldweg 64, 6130 Schwaz, Tyrol, Austria.
Markus PremDepartment for Food and Packaging Technology, Kempten University of Applied Sciences, Bahnhofstrasse 61, 87435 Kempten, Bayern, Germany.
Lothar ZapfZLV-Zentrum für Lebensmittel- und Verpackungstechnologie e.V., Ignaz-Kiechle-Strasse 20-22, 87437 Kempten, Bayern, Germany.
Stefan ScheibelMULTIVAC Sepp Haggenmüller SE & Co. KG, Bahnhofstrasse 4, 87787 Wolfertschwenden, Bayern, Germany.
Gerhard MargreiterNATURABIOMAT GmbH, Oberer Feldweg 64, 6130 Schwaz, Tyrol, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5495-7201
Christian W HuckInstitute for Analytical Chemistry and Radiochemistry, Leopold Franzens University of Innsbruck, Innrain 80-82, 6020 Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6272-3242
Katrin BachDepartment of Food Technology and Nutrition, Management Center Innsbruck, Universitaetsstrasse 15, 6020 Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria.

Funding

European Regional Development Fund AB116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The packaging of fresh meat has been studied for decades, leading to improved packaging types and conditions such as modified atmosphere packaging (MAP). While commonly used meat packaging uses fossil fuel-based materials, the use of biodegradable packaging materials for this application has not been studied widely. This study aimed at evaluating the sustainability of biodegradable packaging materials compared to established conventional packaging materials through analyses of the quality of freshly packaged pork. The quality was assessed by evaluating sensory aspects, meat color and microbiological attributes of the pork products. The results show no significant differences (

Indexed as

biodegradable packaginggreen packagingmeat qualitymeat shelf lifemodified atmosphere packaging

Identifiers

PMID33291660
PMCPMC7761919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.